Genetic Carrier Screening (GCS) in Clinical Practice: A Current Survey of Physician Impressions and Attitudes [37G]. Issue 1 (May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Genetic Carrier Screening (GCS) in Clinical Practice: A Current Survey of Physician Impressions and Attitudes [37G]. Issue 1 (May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Genetic Carrier Screening (GCS) in Clinical Practice
- Authors:
- Briggs, Allison
Nouri, Parvaneh
Galloway, Michael
Yaklic, Jerome L.
Maxwell, Rose
Lindheim, Steven - Abstract:
- Abstract : INTRODUCTION: GCS is an important component of preconception and prenatal care and allows for cost-effective and efficient screening. Given the complexity, we evaluated current physicians' attitudes towards GCS and Expanded (E)-GCS to assess current practice. METHODS: The 32-question survey was distributed to Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Subspecialists through SurveyMonkey by Listserve database and our Premiere Health System. RESULTS: Overall 297 Obstetrician and Gynecologists responded. Compared to 5 years ago, providers were more likely to offer ethnic based GCS or E-GCS prior to conception (24%, vs 13%, P < .001) or post-conception (27%, vs 16%, P < .001). Currently, GCS based on family history (47%) was offered more than E-GCS (17%, P < .001). Ideally, physicians believed GCS should be offered during pre-conception counseling (57%) and during early pregnancy (33%), but limited by current office policy where it was more likely to be discussed during fertility (51%, ) and post-miscarriage (43%) appointments, compared to contraceptive counseling (19%) and annual exams (14%, P < .001). GCS was addressed by physicians (67%) in most practices and 57% stated they were comfortable with counseling, however, only 32.0% were comfortable discussing a positive screening result, (P < .01). Fifty-five percent felt E-GCS should not be offered until clinical significance of each disease was fully understood compared to 26% who felt should be offered regardless. CONCLUSION:Abstract : INTRODUCTION: GCS is an important component of preconception and prenatal care and allows for cost-effective and efficient screening. Given the complexity, we evaluated current physicians' attitudes towards GCS and Expanded (E)-GCS to assess current practice. METHODS: The 32-question survey was distributed to Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Subspecialists through SurveyMonkey by Listserve database and our Premiere Health System. RESULTS: Overall 297 Obstetrician and Gynecologists responded. Compared to 5 years ago, providers were more likely to offer ethnic based GCS or E-GCS prior to conception (24%, vs 13%, P < .001) or post-conception (27%, vs 16%, P < .001). Currently, GCS based on family history (47%) was offered more than E-GCS (17%, P < .001). Ideally, physicians believed GCS should be offered during pre-conception counseling (57%) and during early pregnancy (33%), but limited by current office policy where it was more likely to be discussed during fertility (51%, ) and post-miscarriage (43%) appointments, compared to contraceptive counseling (19%) and annual exams (14%, P < .001). GCS was addressed by physicians (67%) in most practices and 57% stated they were comfortable with counseling, however, only 32.0% were comfortable discussing a positive screening result, (P < .01). Fifty-five percent felt E-GCS should not be offered until clinical significance of each disease was fully understood compared to 26% who felt should be offered regardless. CONCLUSION: GCS is an underutilized resource which may be due to the level of comfort with counseling and beliefs surrounding E-GCS. Continued education and training programs are warranted to implement GCS and E-GCS in routine practice. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 129:Issue 1(2017)
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 129:Issue 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 129, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 129
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0129-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000514902.97016.56 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4530.xml