Assessment of diffusion tensor MR imaging (DTI) in liver fibrosis with minimal confounding effect of hepatic steatosis. Issue 4 (14th April 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment of diffusion tensor MR imaging (DTI) in liver fibrosis with minimal confounding effect of hepatic steatosis. Issue 4 (14th April 2014)
- Main Title:
- Assessment of diffusion tensor MR imaging (DTI) in liver fibrosis with minimal confounding effect of hepatic steatosis
- Authors:
- Lee, Yunjung
Kim, Hyeonjin - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: Given the potential confounding effect of fat on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the liver, we have assessed diffusion tensor imaging in liver fibrosis with minimal effect of fat on ADC and fractional anisotropy (FA). Methods: Thirty‐six mice were used, among which 20 mice were CCl4 treated for fibrosis induction. Diffusion tensor imaging was performed at 9.4T using a spin‐echo diffusion tensor imaging sequence with six gradient directions. Hepatic fat fraction obtained by MR spectroscopy was used as hepatic fat content. Fibrosis scores were obtained from histopathology. Results: The hepatic fat fractions of the two animal groups were below 5.5% and not different (5.3 ± 1.5 vs. 4.6 ± 1.1%; P = 0.115). Fibrosis scores were higher in CCl4 ‐treated mice (0.0 ± 0.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7; P < 0.001). Nonetheless, there was no difference in ADC between the two groups (0.711 ± 0.068 × 10 −3 vs. 0.718 ± 0.095 × 10 −3 mm 2 s −1 ; P = 0.911). The treated group had a lower FA than control (0.552 ± 0.050 vs. 0.586 ± 0.013; P = 0.023). ADC was not correlated with hepatic fat fraction and fibrosis. FA was correlated with hepatic fat fraction ( r = 0.418, P = 0.011) and fibrosis ( r = −0.411, P = 0.012). Conclusion: FA may be more sensitive to mild‐to‐moderate liver fibrosis than ADC. In addition to ADC, FA may also be sensitive to hepatic fat content, and therefore need careful interpretation in liver fibrosis with concomitant fatty liver.Magn Reson MedAbstract : Purpose: Given the potential confounding effect of fat on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the liver, we have assessed diffusion tensor imaging in liver fibrosis with minimal effect of fat on ADC and fractional anisotropy (FA). Methods: Thirty‐six mice were used, among which 20 mice were CCl4 treated for fibrosis induction. Diffusion tensor imaging was performed at 9.4T using a spin‐echo diffusion tensor imaging sequence with six gradient directions. Hepatic fat fraction obtained by MR spectroscopy was used as hepatic fat content. Fibrosis scores were obtained from histopathology. Results: The hepatic fat fractions of the two animal groups were below 5.5% and not different (5.3 ± 1.5 vs. 4.6 ± 1.1%; P = 0.115). Fibrosis scores were higher in CCl4 ‐treated mice (0.0 ± 0.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7; P < 0.001). Nonetheless, there was no difference in ADC between the two groups (0.711 ± 0.068 × 10 −3 vs. 0.718 ± 0.095 × 10 −3 mm 2 s −1 ; P = 0.911). The treated group had a lower FA than control (0.552 ± 0.050 vs. 0.586 ± 0.013; P = 0.023). ADC was not correlated with hepatic fat fraction and fibrosis. FA was correlated with hepatic fat fraction ( r = 0.418, P = 0.011) and fibrosis ( r = −0.411, P = 0.012). Conclusion: FA may be more sensitive to mild‐to‐moderate liver fibrosis than ADC. In addition to ADC, FA may also be sensitive to hepatic fat content, and therefore need careful interpretation in liver fibrosis with concomitant fatty liver.Magn Reson Med 73:1602–1608, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 73:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 73:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 73, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 73
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0073-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 1602
- Page End:
- 1608
- Publication Date:
- 2014-04-14
- Subjects:
- diffusion magnetic resonance imaging -- diffusion tensor imaging -- liver fibrosis -- apparent diffusion coefficient -- fractional anisotropy -- steatosis
Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals
Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals
616.07548 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/mrm.25253 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0740-3194
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5337.798000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4510.xml