Imaging distributed and massed repetitions of natural scenes: Spontaneous retrieval and maintenance. Issue 4 (12th December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bradley, Margaret M.; Costa, Vincent D.; Ferrari, Vera; Codispoti, Maurizio; Fitzsimmons, Jeffrey R.; Lang, Peter J.
• Is Part Of: Human brain mapping. Volume 36:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
• Page Start: 1381
• Page End: 1392
• Publication Date: 2014-12-12
• Subjects: repetition -- retrieval -- posterior parietal; Brain mapping -- Periodicals; 611.81
• DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22708
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1065-9471

Abstract

Abstract: Repetitions that are distributed (spaced) across time prompt enhancement of a memory‐related event‐related potential, compared to when repetitions are massed (contiguous). Here, we used fMRI to investigate neural enhancement and suppression effects during free viewing of natural scenes that were either novel or repeated four times with massed or distributed repetitions. Distributed repetition was uniquely associated with a repetition enhancement effect in a bilateral posterior parietal cluster that included the precuneus and posterior cingulate and which has previously been implicated in episodic memory retrieval. Unique to massed repetition, conversely, was enhancement in a right dorsolateral prefrontal cluster that has been implicated in short‐term maintenance. Repetition suppression effects for both types of spacing were widespread in regions activated during novel picture processing. Taken together, the data are consistent with a hypothesis that distributed repetition prompts spontaneous retrieval of prior occurrences, whereas massed repetition prompts short‐term maintenance of the episodic representation, due to contiguous presentation. These processing differences may mediate the classic spacing effect in learning and memory. Hum Brain Mapp 36:1381–1392, 2015 . ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.