A randomized, double‐blind comparison of antiepileptic drug treatment in the elderly with new‐onset focal epilepsy. (12th February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomized, double‐blind comparison of antiepileptic drug treatment in the elderly with new‐onset focal epilepsy. (12th February 2015)
- Main Title:
- A randomized, double‐blind comparison of antiepileptic drug treatment in the elderly with new‐onset focal epilepsy
- Authors:
- Werhahn, Konrad J.
Trinka, Eugen
Dobesberger, Judith
Unterberger, Iris
Baum, Petra
Deckert‐Schmitz, Maria
Kniess, Tobias
Schmitz, Bettina
Bernedo, Viviane
Ruckes, Christian
Ehrlich, Anne
Krämer, Günter - Abstract:
- Summary: Objective: To compare the effectiveness of controlled‐released carbamazepine (CR‐CBZ) to levetiracetam (LEV) and to lamotrigine (LTG) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Methods: Randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial conducted between January 2007 and August 2011, in 47 ambulatory or hospital sites in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland. Eligible participants were aged ≥60, had new‐onset epilepsy, had no acute illness as the cause of their seizures, and had no contraindication to the drugs in the trial. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to CR‐CBZ, LTG, or LEV. Doses were up‐titrated for 6 weeks and could be maintained or adjusted depending on seizure relapse or tolerability over an additional period of 52 weeks. Primary outcome was the retention to treatment at week 58; secondary measures related to seizure and adverse event frequency. Results: Of 361 randomized patients, 359 were included (CR‐CBZ n = 121, LTG n = 117, LEV n = 122) in the modified intent‐to‐treat population (mean age [range] 71.4 [60–95] years). At week 58, the retention rate for LEV was significantly higher than for CR‐CBZ (61.5% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.02), and similar to LTG (55.6%). Seizure freedom rates at weeks 30 and 58 were not different across the groups. Twice as many patients receiving CR‐CBZ discontinued due to adverse events or death compared to those in the LEV group (32.2% vs. 17.2%; odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25–4.19, p = 0.007), whereasSummary: Objective: To compare the effectiveness of controlled‐released carbamazepine (CR‐CBZ) to levetiracetam (LEV) and to lamotrigine (LTG) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Methods: Randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial conducted between January 2007 and August 2011, in 47 ambulatory or hospital sites in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland. Eligible participants were aged ≥60, had new‐onset epilepsy, had no acute illness as the cause of their seizures, and had no contraindication to the drugs in the trial. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to CR‐CBZ, LTG, or LEV. Doses were up‐titrated for 6 weeks and could be maintained or adjusted depending on seizure relapse or tolerability over an additional period of 52 weeks. Primary outcome was the retention to treatment at week 58; secondary measures related to seizure and adverse event frequency. Results: Of 361 randomized patients, 359 were included (CR‐CBZ n = 121, LTG n = 117, LEV n = 122) in the modified intent‐to‐treat population (mean age [range] 71.4 [60–95] years). At week 58, the retention rate for LEV was significantly higher than for CR‐CBZ (61.5% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.02), and similar to LTG (55.6%). Seizure freedom rates at weeks 30 and 58 were not different across the groups. Twice as many patients receiving CR‐CBZ discontinued due to adverse events or death compared to those in the LEV group (32.2% vs. 17.2%; odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25–4.19, p = 0.007), whereas discontinuation was intermediate for LTG (26.3%). Median daily doses of completers (n = 195) were CR‐CBZ 380.0 mg/day (333.0–384.0), LTG 95 mg/day (94.0–97.0), and LEV 950 mg/day (940.0–985.0). Significance: In the initial monotherapy of focal epilepsy in the elderly, 1‐year retention to LEV was higher compared to CR‐CBZ due to better tolerability. Retention of LTG was intermediate and close to LEV, but did not differ significantly from either comparators. NCT00438451, www.clinicaltrials.gov . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Epilepsia. Volume 56:issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Epilepsia
- Issue:
- Volume 56:issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0056-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 450
- Page End:
- 459
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02-12
- Subjects:
- Elderly -- Monotherapy -- Antiepileptic drugs -- Levetiracetam -- Carbamazepine
Epilepsy -- Periodicals
616.853 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=epi ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/epi.12926 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0013-9580
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3793.700000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4482.xml