A gap analysis of the United States death care sector to determine training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease mitigation and management. Issue 9 (2nd September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Le, Aurora B.; Witter, Lesley; Herstein, Jocelyn J.; Jelden, Katelyn C.; Beam, Elizabeth L.; Gibbs, Shawn G.; Lowe, John J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. Volume 14:Issue 9(2017)
• Page Start: 674
• Page End: 680
• Publication Date: 2017-09-02
• Subjects: Death care -- Ebola virus disease -- highly infectious remains -- infectious disease education -- infectious disease training; Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals; Occupational Health -- Periodicals; Environmental Exposure -- Periodicals; Environmental Health -- Periodicals; Occupational Exposure -- Periodicals; Hygiène industrielle -- Périodiques; Hygiène du milieu -- Périodiques; Médecine du travail -- Périodiques; 613.62
• DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1319570
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-9624

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose : A United States industry-specific gap analysis survey of the death care sector—which comprises organizations and businesses affiliated with the funeral industry and the handling of human remains— was developed, the results analyzed, and training and education needs in relation to highly infectious disease mitigation and management were explored in an effort to identify where occupational health and safety can be enhanced in this worker population. Methods : Collaborating national death care organizations distributed the 47-question electronic survey. N = 424 surveys were initiated and results recorded. The survey collected death care sector-specific information pertaining to the comfortability and willingness to handle highly infectious remains; perceptions of readiness, current policies and procedures in place to address highly infectious diseases; current highly infectious disease training levels, available resources, and personal protective equipment. Results : One-third of respondents have been trained on how to manage highly infectious remains. There was a discrepancy between Supervisor/Management and Employee/Worker perceptions on employees' willingness and comfortability to manage potentially highly infectious remains. More than 40% of respondents did not know the correct routes of transmission for viral hemorrhagic fevers. Conclusions : Results suggest death care workers could benefit from increasing up-to-date industry-specific training and education on highly infectious disease risk mitigation and management. Professional death care sector organizations are positioned to disseminate information, training, and best practices.