Interstate border disputes in Africa: Their resolution and implications for human rights and peace. Issue 3 (3rd July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sone, Patience Munge
• Is Part Of: African security review. Volume 26:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 325
• Page End: 339
• Publication Date: 2017-07-03
• Subjects: Interstate -- border disputes -- resolution -- implications -- human rights -- peace; Human security -- Africa -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.32096
• DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2017.1294089
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1024-6029

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Many researchers have focused on the role colonialism has played in causing interstate border disputes in Africa. Besides the colonial issue, this paper seeks to investigate what other factors fuel interstate border disputes in Africa and determine how effectively the disputes can be resolved. In recent decades, Africa has been tormented by and is still experiencing numerous interstate border disputes which have serious implications for the disputing states. Some of the disputes are resolved, but violations of human rights and instability still occur in these regions. By analysing the content of some relevant documents and with the use of interviews, this paper reveals that most disputing African states rely heavily on foreign intervention (especially by their erstwhile colonial masters) in the resolution of their disputes. It is argued that African leaders need to be more committed and exhibit better leadership in resolving their border disputes, and that they should always seek the expertise of African forums such as the African Union (AU) before calling for foreign intervention. It is suggested that African leaders and the AU understand the problems of Africans better than anyone else, and they are also the ones mostly greatly affected by these disputes. Thus, there needs to be more of a focus on addressing the root causes of disputes in order to avoid them resurfacing, rather than seeking to merely halt them.