Comparison of the acute effects of high‐intensity interval training and continuous aerobic walking on inhibitory control. (8th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kao, Shih‐Chun; Westfall, Daniel R.; Soneson, Jack; Gurd, Brendon; Hillman, Charles H.
• Is Part Of: Psychophysiology. Volume 54:Number 9(2017:Sep.)
• Page Start: 1335
• Page End: 1345
• Publication Date: 2017-05-08
• Subjects: acute exercise -- cognitive control -- ERP -- HIIT -- P3; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12889
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0048-5772

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a single bout of high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) on inhibitory control. The P3 component of the stimulus‐locked ERP was collected in 64 young adults during a modified flanker task following 20 min of seated rest, 20 min of CAE, and 9 min of HIIT on separate days in counterbalanced order. Participants exhibited shorter overall reaction time following CAE and HIIT compared to seated rest. Response accuracy improved following HIIT in the task condition requiring greater inhibitory control compared to seated rest and CAE. P3 amplitude was larger following CAE compared to seated rest and HIIT. Decreased P3 amplitude and latency were observed following HIIT compared to seated rest. The current results replicated previous findings indicating the beneficial effect of acute CAE on behavioral and neuroelectric indices of inhibitory control. With a smaller duration and volume of exercise, a single bout of HIIT resulted in additional improvements in inhibitory control, paralleled by a smaller and more efficient P3 component. In sum, the current study demonstrated that CAE and HIIT differentially facilitate inhibitory control and its underlying neuroelectric activation, and that HIIT may be a time‐efficient approach for enhancing cognitive health.