A survey on multiaxial fatigue damage parameters under non‐proportional loadings. Issue 9 (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luo, Peng; Yao, Weixing; Susmel, Luca; Wang, Yingyu; Ma, Xiaoxiao
• Is Part Of: Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures. Volume 40:Issue 9(2017:Sep.)
• Page Start: 1323
• Page End: 1342
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: direct damage parameters -- equivalent damage parameters -- multiaxial fatigue -- nonproportional additional hardening; Materials -- Fatigue -- Periodicals; Fracture mechanics -- Periodicals; 620.1123
• DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8756-758X

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, several multiaxial fatigue damage parameters taking into account nonproportional additional hardening are reviewed. According to the way nonproportional additional hardening is considered in the model, the damage parameters are classified into 2 categories: (1) equivalent damage parameters and (2) direct damage parameters. The equivalent damage parameters usually define a nonproportional coefficient to consider nonproportional additional cyclic hardening, and make a combination of this nonproportional coefficient with stress and/or strain quantities to calculate the equivalent damage parameters. In contrast, the direct damage parameters are directly estimated from the stress and strain quantities of interest. The accuracy of 4 multiaxial fatigue damage parameters in predicting fatigue lifetime is checked against about 150 groups of experimental data for 10 different metallic materials under multiaxial fatigue loading. The results revealed that both Itoh's model, one of equivalent damage parameters, and Susmel's model, which belong to direct damage parameters, could provide a better correlation with the experimental results than others assessed in this paper. So direct damage parameters are not better than the equivalent damage parameters in predicting fatigue lifetime.