Conservation finance and sustainable tourism: the acceptability of conservation fees to support the Tambopata National Reserve, Peru. Issue 10 (3rd October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roberts, Ryan M.; Jones, Kelly W.; Seidl, Andrew; Ek, Audrey; Smith, Hannah
• Is Part Of: Journal of sustainable tourism. Volume 25:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 1353
• Page End: 1366
• Publication Date: 2017-10-03
• Subjects: Ecotourism -- protected areas -- conservation fee -- biodiversity -- ecosystem services -- Tambopata National Reserve; Tourism -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 338.479105
• DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1257630
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-9582

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Protected areas are key to the conservation of global biodiversity and ecosystem services; however, their success is contingent upon adequate funding. One possibility to increase funding for park management is to "sell" a wider suite of ecosystem services "produced" by protected areas, such as carbon sequestration. We conducted 420 tourist surveys to analyze willingness to pay (WTP) for ecosystem service benefits via a conservation fee in the Tambopata National Reserve in Peru. We also interviewed eight tour operators about their perceptions of the proposed fee. The average stated WTP was 15 USD. Sixty-six percent of tourists stated they would pay 10 USD or more, which, if actually paid, would have resulted in 318, 000 USD for park management in 2015. Most respondents stated they would pay an additional fee if it supported biodiversity conservation or local ecosystem services, such as water, but less than 10% of tourists were motivated by carbon sequestration as a reason to pay the fee. Most tour operators supported the additional fee. Our findings suggest that tourists are willing to pay higher fees to support conservation but that interest in paying for additional ecosystem services from parks may not extend to global and intangible benefits such as carbon sequestration.