A quantitative framework for testing the resilience of Islamic finance portfolios under IFSB and Basel capital rules. Issue 3 (21st August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Aydın, Nadi Serhan
• Is Part Of: International journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern finance and management. Volume 10:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 290
• Page End: 311
• Publication Date: 2017-08-21
• Subjects: Islamic finance -- Backtesting risk models -- Capital adequacy -- IFSB and Basel III -- Model-based stress-testing -- Second-round effects; Finance -- Religious aspects -- Islam -- Periodicals; Financial institutions -- Religious aspects -- Islam -- Periodicals; Financial institutions -- Islamic countries -- Periodicals; Finance -- Islamic countries -- Periodicals; Management -- Religious aspects -- Islam -- Periodicals; Management -- Islamic countries -- Periodicals; 332.09176705
• DOI: 10.1108/IMEFM-03-2016-0036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1753-8394

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This paper aims to introduce a model-based stress-testing methodology for Islamic finance products. The importance of stress testing was indeed clearly underlined by the adverse developments in the global finance industry. One of the key takeaways was the need to strengthen the coverage of the capital framework. Cognisant of this fact, Basel III encapsulates provisions to enhance the financial sector's ability to withstand shocks arising from possible stress events, thereby reducing adverse spillovers into the real economy. Similarly, the Islamic Financial Services Board requires Islamic financial institutions to run stress tests as part of capital planning. Design/methodology/approach: The authors perform thorough backtests on Islamic and conventional portfolios under widely used risk models, which are characterised by an underlying conditional volatility framework and distribution, to identify the most suitable risk model specification. Associated with an appropriate initial shock and estimation window size, the paper also conducts a model-based stress test to examine whether the stress losses estimated by the selected models compare favourably to the historical shocks. Findings: The results suggest that the model-based framework, when combined with an appropriate risk model and distribution, can successfully reproduce past stress periods. The conditional empirical risk model is the most effective one in both long and short portfolio cases – particularly when combined with a long-enough estimation window. The relative performance of normal vs heavy-tailed distributions and symmetric vs asymmetric risk models, on the other hand, is highly dependent on whether the portfolio is long or short. Finally, the authors find that the Islamic portfolio is generally associated with lower historical stress losses as compared to the conventional portfolio. Originality/value: The model-based framework eliminates some of the key problems associated with traditional scenario-based approaches and is easily adaptable to Islamic finance.