Percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint: A case-based preoperative planning approach reduces operating time and radiation exposure. Issue 8 (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ecker, T.M.; Jost, J.; Cullmann, J.L.; Zech, W.D.; Djonov, V.; Keel, M.J.B.; Benneker, L.M.; Bastian, J.D.
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 48:Issue 8(2017)
• Page Start: 1825
• Page End: 1830
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: Iliosacral screw -- Lateral projection -- Placement -- Entry point -- Aiming point -- Pathway -- Secure -- Optimal; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: A preoperative planning approach for percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint provides specific entry points (EPs) and aiming points (APs) of intraosseous screw pathways (as defined by CT scans) for lateral fluoroscopic projections used intraoperatively. The potential to achieve the recommended EPs and APs, to obtain an ideal screw position (perpendicular to the iliosacral joint), to avoid occurrence of extraosseous screw misplacement, to reduce the operating time and the radiation exposure by utilizing this planning approach have not been described yet. Methods: On preoperative CT scans of eight human cadaveric specimen individual EPs and APs were identified and transferred to the lateral fluoroscopic projection using a coordinate system with the zero-point in the center of the posterior cortex of the S1 vertebral body (x-axis parallel to upper S1 endplate). Distances were expressed in relation to the anteroposterior distance of the S1 upper endplate (in%). In each specimen on one side a screw was placed with provided EP and AP (New Technique) whereas at the contralateral side a screw was placed without given EP and AP (Conventional Technique). Both techniques were compared using postoperative CT scans to assess distances between predefined EPs and APs and the actually obtained EPs and APs, screw angulations in relation to the iliosacral joint in coronal and axial planes and the occurrence of any extraosseous screw misplacement. The "operating time (OT)" and the "time under fluoroscopy (TUF)" were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: EPs were realized significantly more accurate using the new technique in vertical direction. The screw positions in relation to the iliosacral joint showed no significant difference between both techniques. Both techniques had one aberrantly placed screw outside the safe corridor. The (mean ± SD) "OT" and the (mean ± SD) "TUF" were significantly decreased using the new technique compared to the conventional technique (OT: 7.6 ± 2 min versus 13.1 ± 5.8 min, p = 0.012; TUF: 1.5 ± 0.8 min versus 2.2 ± 1.1 min). Conclusion: The presented preoperative planning approach increases the accuracy in percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint, reduces operating time and minimizes radiation exposure to patient and staff.