Classification of normal screening mammograms is strongly influenced by perceived mammographic breast density. Issue 4 (3rd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ang, Zoey ZY; Rawashdeh, Mohammad A; Heard, Rob; Brennan, Patrick C; Lee, Warwick; Lewis, Sarah J
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. Volume 61:Issue 4(2017:Aug.)
• Page Start: 461
• Page End: 469
• Publication Date: 2017-01-03
• Subjects: breast density -- normal mammograms -- reader strategy -- screening mammography; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australasia -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12576
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-9477

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: To investigate how breast screen readers classify normal screening cases using descriptors of normal mammographic features and to assess test cases for suitability for a single reading strategy. Methods: Fifteen breast screen readers interpreted a test set of 29 normal screening cases and classified them by firstly rating their perceived difficulty to reach a 'normal' decision, secondly identifying the cases' salient normal mammographic features and thirdly assessing the cases' suitability for a single reading strategy. Results: The relationship between the perceived difficulty in making 'normal' decisions and the normal mammographic features was investigated. Regular ductal pattern ( T b = −0.439, P = 0.001), uniform density ( T b = −0.527, P < 0.001), non‐dense breasts ( T b = −0.736, P < 0.001), symmetrical mammographic features ( T b = −0.474, P = 0.001) and overlapped density ( T b = 0.630, P < 0.001) had a moderate to strong correlation with the difficulty to make 'normal' decisions. Cases with regular ductal pattern ( T b = 0.447, P = 0.002), uniform density ( T b = 0.550, P < 0.001), non‐dense breasts ( T b = 0.748, P < 0.001) and symmetrical mammographic features ( T b = 0.460, P = 0.001) were considered to be more suitable for single reading, whereas cases with overlapped density were not ( T b = −0.679, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The findings suggest that perceived mammographic breast density has a major influence on the difficulty for readers to classify cases as normal and hence their suitability for single reading.