Hybrid and fully‐etched surface implants in periodontally healthy patients: A comparative retrospective study on marginal bone loss. (29th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Spinato, Sergio; Bernardello, Fabio; Sassatelli, Paolo; Zaffe, Davide
• Is Part Of: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. Volume 19:Number 4(2017:Aug.)
• Page Start: 663
• Page End: 670
• Publication Date: 2017-05-29
• Subjects: abutment height -- hybrid surface implants -- marginal bone loss -- periodontally healthy patients -- retrospective -- sandblasted and double etched surface implants -- short‐term; Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dental Implantation -- Periodicals; Dental Implants -- Periodicals; 617.693
• DOI: 10.1111/cid.12504
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1523-0899

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Human studies on implants with the same design but with different surfaces are lacking at the present time. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the survival rate of and marginal bone loss (MBL) around 2 types of implants with the same design, but with different surfaces: fully "sandblasted and double‐etched" (SDE) implants and hybrid (H) implants, with an apical SDE‐surface and a coronal machined‐surface. Materials and methods: The SDE‐ and H‐surfaces were previously analyzed under SEM and profilometer. Implants were placed in partially edentulous periodontally healthy patients requiring single implant‐restoration, in either mandible or maxilla, with cement‐retained prosthetic restoration. Twelve months after prosthetic loading, MBL in relation to prosthetic abutment height (AH), calculated radiographically, was statistically analyzed. Results: SEM and profilometer analyses revealed no differences between the SDE‐surfaces of either SDE‐ or H‐implants. Transverse ridges and grooves characterized the machined portion of H‐implants, clearly influencing the profilometer analysis. In 75 patients, 37 SDE and 38 H‐implants were placed and all functioned completely after 12 months. In both SDE‐ and H‐groups, MBL had a significant inverse relationship with AH, with greater intercept and negative slope for SDE‐group and intersection of the 2 regression lines at AH = 2 mm. Conclusions: A 100% survival rate was recorded for SDE‐ and H‐implants placed in pristine bone of periodontally healthy patients; MBL was limited and similar in both SDE‐ and H‐groups; the higher the prosthetic AH, the lesser the MBL around implants; H‐implants could reduce bone loss most effectively with abutments lower than 2 mm, realistically exploitable on thin biotypes; SDE‐implants could reduce bone loss most effectively with abutments greater than 2 mm, realistically exploitable on thick biotypes.