Crossing boundaries of state and religious power: Reproductive mobilities in Singapore. (13th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mariano, Danicar; Yeoh, Brenda S.A.; Cheng, Yi'En
• Other Names: Chee Heng Leng guestEditor.; Whittaker Andrea guestEditor.; Yeoh Brenda S.A. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Asia Pacific viewpoint. Volume 58:Number 2(2017:Aug.)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 215
• Publication Date: 2017-07-13
• Subjects: assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) -- bridgespace -- fertility seeking -- Internet discussion threads -- multi‐religious communities -- Singapore; Asia -- Economic conditions -- Periodicals; Asia -- Social conditions -- Periodicals; Pacific Area -- Economic conditions -- Periodicals; Pacific Area -- Social conditions -- Periodicals; 910.91823
• DOI: 10.1111/apv.12163
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1360-7456

Abstract

Abstract: Singapore has one of the tightest regulations over assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in Asia, a consequence of Singapore's strong state, the priority it gives to reproduction, and the numerous religious groups in the country and their direct and indirect influence on the Bioethics Advisory Committee, which recommends ART regulations for the country. Together, these key actors give shape to the 'local moral worlds', which undergird ART governance in the country. Drawing on in‐depth interviews and data from online forums, we illustrate Singaporean fertility seekers' attempts to juggle myriad and sometimes confusing obligations to the state, society and religion in making reproductive choices. We then explore the limits and possibilities for fertility seekers to circumvent the restrictive rules and 'moral safety valves' set in place in their home country simply by stepping out to another jurisdiction across national borders. The paper goes on to show how the Internet communities serve as a bridgespace, propelling fertility mobilities by enabling Singaporeans to see creative possibilities in patchwork regulations. At the edges of state and religious power, fertility‐seeking subjects take advantage of liminal spaces, grey areas, or permissive regimes to gain several degrees of freedom to practise adaptive fertility strategies that may be 'unofficial' but 'licit' or 'socially acceptable'.