A double-blind randomized pilot trial comparing computerized cognitive exercises to Tetris in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. (18th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bikic, Aida; Christensen, Torben Østergaard; Leckman, James F.; Bilenberg, Niels; Dalsgaard, Søren
• Is Part Of: Nordic journal of psychiatry. Volume 71:Number 6(2017)
• Page Start: 455
• Page End: 464
• Publication Date: 2017-08-18
• Subjects: ADHD -- cognitive training -- working memory training -- CANTAB -- Tetris; Psychopharmacology -- Periodicals; Psychotherapy -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Scandinavia -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1328070
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0803-9488

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this trial was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of computerized cognitive exercises from Scientific Brain Training (SBT), compared to the computer game Tetris as an active placebo, in a pilot study of adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: Eighteen adolescents with ADHD were randomized to treatment or control intervention for 7 weeks. Outcome measures were cognitive test, symptom, and motivation questionnaires. Results: SBT and Tetris were feasible as home-based interventions, and participants' compliance was high, but participants perceived both interventions as not very interesting or helpful. There were no significant group differences on cognitive and ADHD-symptom measures after intervention. Pre–post intra-group measurement showed that the SBT had a significant beneficial effect on sustained attention, while the active placebo had significant beneficial effects on working memory, both with large effect sizes. Conclusion: Although no significant differences were found between groups on any measure, there were significant intra-group changes for each group.