Context and Content toward Consensus in Public Mediation. Issue 3 (July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Itten, Anatol
• Is Part Of: Negotiation journal. Volume 33:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 185
• Page End: 211
• Publication Date: 2017-07
• Subjects: public mediation -- alternative conflict resolution -- consensus -- comparative conflict studies -- influencing factors; Conflict management -- Periodicals; Negotiation -- Periodicals; Dispute resolution (Law) -- Periodicals; 302.3
• DOI: 10.1111/nejo.12182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0748-4526

Abstract

Abstract : The mediation of public conflicts is a complex interactive, social‐psychological, and often politicized process. Because of their complexity, the literature on how to effectively mediate these conflicts remains imprecise. In this study, I have focused on the sequencing of the overall mediation process and the interplay between initial conditions, mediation styles, and process dynamics to explore predictable patterns from early stage to deadline negotiations. By undertaking a two‐step qualitative comparison of twenty‐three public mediation cases, I have attempted to identify "equifinal" pathways — that is, a variety of different ways in which the same outcome can be achieved — that can lead to mediation success (or failure). My analysis reveals that both inclusivity (i.e., including all relevant participants in the process) and mediation institutionalization (i.e., the mediation process is sufficiently embedded in the political and administrative system) correlate to greater mediation effectiveness. Furthermore, this study also suggests that such key elements of deliberative negotiations as recognition and argumentation are essential for reaching a consensual agreement.