Rice fortification: a comparative analysis in mandated settings. (9th June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Forsman, Carmen; Milani, Peiman; Schondebare, Jill A.; Matthias, Dipika; Guyondet, Christophe
• Other Names: De‐Regil Luz Maria guestEditor.; Laillou Arnaud guestEditor.; Moench-Pfanner Regina guestEditor.; Peña‐Rosas Juan Pablo guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Volume 1324(2014)
• Page Start: 67
• Page End: 81
• Publication Date: 2014-06-09
• Subjects: rice fortification -- fortified rice -- micronutrient deficiencies -- Philippines -- Costa Rica; Medical sciences -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12453
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0077-8923

Abstract

Abstract : Legal mandates can play an important role in the success of rice fortification programs that involve the private sector. However, merely enacting mandatory legislation does not guarantee success; it requires a coordinated, multidimensional cross‐sector effort that addresses stewardship, develops an appropriate rice fortification technology, enables sustainable production and distribution channels through a range of private‐sector players, ensures quality, generates consumer demand, and monitors progress. Furthermore, economic sustainability must be built into the supply chain and distribution network to enable the program to outlast government administrations and/or time‐limited funding. Hence, mandates can serve as valuable long‐term enablers of cross‐sector mobilization and collaboration and as catalysts of civil society engagement in and ownership of fortification programs. This paper compares the rice fortification experiences of Costa Rica and the Philippines—two countries with mandates, yet distinctly different industry landscapes. Costa Rica has achieved national success through strong government stewardship and active market development—key elements of success regardless of industry structure. With a comparatively more diffuse rice industry structure, the Philippines has also had success in limited geographies where key stakeholders have played an active role in market development. A comparative analysis provides lessons that may be relevant to other rice fortification programs.