Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States. Issue 8 (20th April 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States. Issue 8 (20th April 2017)
- Main Title:
- Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States
- Authors:
- Dale, Virginia H.
Kline, Keith L.
Parish, Esther S.
Cowie, Annette L.
Emory, Robert
Malmsheimer, Robert W.
Slade, Raphael
SMITH, Charles Tattersall (Tat)
Wigley, Thomas Bently (BEN)
Bentsen, Niclas S.
Berndes, Göran
Bernier, Pierre
Brandão, Miguel
Chum, Helena L.
Diaz‐Chavez, Rocio
Egnell, Gustaf
Gustavsson, Leif
Schweinle, Jörg
Stupak, Inge
Trianosky, Paul
Walter, Arnaldo
Whittaker, Carly
Brown, Mark
Chescheir, George
Dimitriou, Ioannis
Donnison, Caspar
Goss Eng, Alison
Hoyt, Kevin P.
Jenkins, Jennifer C.
Johnson, Kristen
Levesque, Charles A.
Lockhart, Victoria
Negri, Maria Cristina
Nettles, Jami E.
Wellisch, Maria
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: The ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood‐pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention as US exports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, 'How is the production of wood pellets in the SE USA affecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?' To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in the SE USA are a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insectAbstract: The ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood‐pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention as US exports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, 'How is the production of wood pellets in the SE USA affecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?' To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in the SE USA are a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insect outbreaks. Bioenergy also increases the value of forest land to landowners, thereby decreasing likelihood of conversion to nonforest uses. Monitoring and evaluation are essential to verify that regulations and good practices are achieving goals and to enable timely responses if problems arise. Conducting rigorous research to understand how conditions change in response to management choices requires baseline data, monitoring, and appropriate reference scenarios. Long‐term monitoring data on forest conditions should be publicly accessible and utilized to inform adaptive management. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Global change biology. Volume 9:Issue 8(2017)
- Journal:
- Global change biology
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 8(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 8 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0009-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1296
- Page End:
- 1305
- Publication Date:
- 2017-04-20
- Subjects:
- best management practices -- biodiversity -- bioenergy -- carbon -- ecosystem services -- forests -- pellets -- southeastern United States -- sustainability
Biomass energy -- Periodicals
Biomass energy -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Energy crops -- Periodicals
662.88 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1757-1707 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122199997/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/gcbb.12445 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1757-1693
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4095.343410
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2912.xml