The Philosopher and the Dialectician in Aristotle's Topics. Issue 1 (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Merry, David
• Is Part Of: History and philosophy of logic. Volume 37:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 78
• Page End: 100
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: Logic -- Periodicals; 160.905
• DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2015.1085173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-5340

Abstract

Abstract : I claim that, in the Topics, Aristotle advises dialectical questioners to intentionally argue fallaciously in order to escape from some dialectically awkward positions, and I work through the consequences of that claim. It will turn out that, although there are important exceptions, the techniques for finding arguments described in Topics I–VII are, by and large, locations that Aristotle thought of as appropriate for use in philosophical inquiry. The text that grounds this claim, however, raises a further problem: it highlights the solitary nature of philosophical inquiry, which puts into question the philosophical relevance of Topics VIII . I find that the Topics provides inadequate grounds for thinking that Aristotle saw Topics VIII as describing standards or techniques of argument that were appropriate for philosophy, and so these texts cannot be used by contemporary commentators to shed light on Aristotle's philosophical practice. Finally, although Aristotle saw philosophy as a solitary activity, he thought dialectic played an important part in a typical philosophical life, both as a means for defending one's reputation, and as a way of participating in an intellectual community.