Study of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in advanced heart‐failure patients (SWIFT). (29th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barsheshet, Alon; Kutyifa, Valentina; Vamvouris, Theodora; Moss, Arthur J.; Biton, Yitschak; Chen, Leway; Storozynsky, Eugene; Wan, Chingping; Szymkiewicz, Steven J.; Goldenberg, Ilan
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 28:Number 7(2017)
• Page Start: 778
• Page End: 784
• Publication Date: 2017-05-29
• Subjects: defibrillator shock -- heart failure -- implantable cardioverter defibrillator -- ventricular tachycardia -- wearable cardioverter defibrillator; Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.13229
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-3873

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) may allow stabilization until reassessment for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) among high‐risk heart failure (HF) patients. However, there are limited data on the WCD benefit in the acute decompensated HF setting. Methods and results: The Study of the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Advanced Heart Failure Patients( SWIFT) was a prospective clinical trial carried out at two medical centers. Patients hospitalized with advanced HF symptoms and reduced left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) were enrolled and prescribed a WCD prior to discharge for a total of 3 months. Outcome measures included arrhythmic events, WCD discharge, and death. Study patients (n = 75, mean age 51 ± 14 years, 31% women) had a mean LVEF of 21.5 ± 10.4%. Non‐ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 66% of patients. The median WCD wearing time was 59 (interquartile range 17–97) days, and 80% of patients wore the device >50% of daily hours. WCD interrogations showed a total of 8 arrhythmic events in 5 patients, including 3 nonsustained or self‐terminating ventricular tachycardia (VT) events, and one polymorphic VT successfully terminated by the WCD. None of the patients died while wearing the device and no inappropriate device therapies occurred. Upon termination of treatment with the WCD, 21 patients (28%) received an ICD. At 3 years, the cumulative death rate was 20% in the ischemic and 21% in non‐ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Conclusion: A management strategy incorporating the WCD can be safely used to bridge the decision regarding the need for ICD implantation in high‐risk patients with advanced HF.