Effectiveness of the parent-mediated intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder in south Asia in India and Pakistan (PASS): a randomised controlled trial. (February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rahman, Atif; Divan, Gauri; Hamdani, Syed Usman; Vajaratkar, Vivek; Taylor, Carol; Leadbitter, Kathy; Aldred, Catherine; Minhas, Ayesha; Cardozo, Percy; Emsley, Richard; Patel, Vikram; Green, Jonathan
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 3:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 128
• Page End: 136
• Publication Date: 2016-02
• Subjects: Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00388-0
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2215-0366

Abstract

Summary: Background: Autism spectrum disorder affects more than 5 million children in south Asia. Although early interventions have been used for the treatment of children in high-income countries, no substantive trials have been done of the interventions adapted for use in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We therefore assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the parent-mediated intervention for autism spectrum disorder in south Asia (PASS) in India and Pakistan. Methods: A single-blind randomised trial of the comparison of 12 sessions of PASS (plus treatment as usual) with treatment as usual alone delivered by non-specialist health workers was done at two centres in Goa, India, and Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Children aged 2–9 years with autism spectrum disorder were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of probabilistic minimisation, controlling for treatment centre (Goa or Rawalpindi), age (<6 years or ≥6 years), and functional impairment (Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale Composite score <65 or ≥65). The primary outcome was quality of parent–child interaction on the Dyadic Communication Measure for Autism at 8 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN79675498. Findings: From Jan 1 to July 30, 2013, 65 children were randomly allocated, 32 to the PASS group (15 in Goa and 17 in Rawalpindi) and 33 to the treatment-as-usual group (15 in Goa and 18 in Rawalpindi). 26 (81%) of 32 participants completed the intervention. After adjustment for minimisation factors and baseline outcome, the primary outcome showed a treatment effect in favour of PASS in parental synchrony (adjusted mean difference 0·25 [95% CI 0·14 to 0·36]; effect size 1·61 [95% CI 0·90 to 2·32]) and initiation of communication by the child with the parent (0·15 [0·04 to 0·26]; effect size 0·99 [0·29 to 1·68]), but time in mutual shared attention was reduced (−0·16 [–0·26 to −0·05]; effect size −0·70 [–1·16 to −0·23]). Interpretation: Our results show the feasibility of adapting and task-shifting an intervention used in a high-income context to LMICs. The findings also replicate the positive primary outcome treatment effects of a parent-mediated communication-focused intervention in the original UK Preschool Autism Communication Trial, with one negative effect not reported previously. Funding: Autism Speaks, USA.