Use of oxygen isotopes to differentiate between nitrous oxide produced by fungi or bacteria during denitrification. (30th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rohe, Lena; Well, Reinhard; Lewicka‐Szczebak, Dominika
• Is Part Of: Rapid communications in mass spectrometry. Volume 31:Number 16(2017)
• Page Start: 1297
• Page End: 1312
• Publication Date: 2017-08-30
• Subjects: Mass spectrometry -- Periodicals; 543.65
• DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7909
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0951-4198

Abstract

Abstract : Rationale: Fungal denitrifiers can contribute substantially to N2 O emissions from arable soil and show a distinct site preference for N2 O (SP(N2 O)). This study sought to identify another process‐specific isotopic tool to improve precise identification of N2 O of fungal origin by mass spectrometric analysis of the N2 O produced. Methods: Three pure bacterial and three fungal species were incubated under denitrifying conditions in treatments with natural abundance and stable isotope labelling to analyse the N2 O produced. Combining different applications of isotope ratio mass spectrometry enabled us to estimate the oxygen (O) exchange accelerated by denitrifying enzymes and the ongoing microbial pathway in parallel. This experimental set‐up allowed the determination of δ 18 O(N2 O) values and isotopic fractionation of O, as well as SP(N2 O) values, as a perspective to differentiate between microbial denitrifiers. Results: Oxygen exchange during N2 O production was lower for bacteria than for fungi, differed between species, and depended also on incubation time. Apparent O isotopic fractionation during denitrification was in a similar range for bacteria and fungi, but application of the fractionation model indicated that different enzymes in bacteria and fungi were responsible for O exchange. This difference was associated with different isotopic fractionation for bacteria and fungi. Conclusions: δ 18 O(N2 O) values depend on isotopic fractionation and isotopic fractionation may differ between processes and organism groups. By comparing SP(N2 O) values, O exchange and the isotopic signature of precursors, we propose here a novel tool for differentiating between different sources of N2 O.