Prognostic Value of Diagnostic Sonography in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis. (25th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fleischer, Adam E.; Albright, Rachel H.; Crews, Ryan T.; Kelil, Tatiana; Wrobel, James S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 35:Number 10(2016)
• Page Start: 1729
• Page End: 1735
• Publication Date: 2015-08-25
• Subjects: biconvexity -- heel pain -- musculoskeletal ultrasound -- plantar fascia -- predictors -- sonography; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.14.10062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the sonographic appearance of the plantar fascia is predictive of the treatment (ie, pain) response in patients receiving supportive therapy for proximal plantar fasciitis. This study was a secondary analysis of data obtained from a randomized controlled trial of ambulatory adults, which examined the efficacy of 3 different foot supports for plantar fasciitis. Methods: Participants underwent diagnostic sonographic examinations of their heel at baseline and again at 3 months by a single experienced foot and ankle surgeon. Quantitative (eg, thickness) and qualitative (eg, biconvexity) characteristics of the fascia were recorded according to a standard protocol. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of the pain response. Results: Seventy patients completed a baseline evaluation, and 63 patients completed a 3‐month follow‐up assessment. The pain response was not associated with the type of foot support ( P > .05). The only significant indicator of an unfavorable response in the univariate and multivariate analyses was biconvexity of the plantar fascia on sonography at presentation (multivariate odds ratio, 4.76 [95% confidence interval, 1.16–19.5; P = .030). Furthermore, changes in self‐reported pain over the 3‐month study period were not accompanied by alterations in plantar fascia thickness over this time ( r = .056; P = .671). Conclusions: We conclude that patients who present with biconvexity of the plantar fascia may be less responsive to tier 1 treatment regimens that center around mechanical support of the plantar fascia. Furthermore, follow‐up measurements of the fascia in this population should not weigh heavily in decisions such as return to play.