Hindered erosion: The biological mediation of noncohesive sediment behavior. Issue 6 (13th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, X. D.; Zhang, C. K.; Paterson, D. M.; Thompson, C. E. L.; Townend, I. H.; Gong, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Feng, Q.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 53:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: 4787
• Page End: 4801
• Publication Date: 2017-06-13
• Subjects: biostabilization -- sediment erosion process -- EPS vertical distribution -- biosediment system; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/2016WR020105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are ubiquitous on tidal flats but their impact on sediment erosion has not been fully understood. Laboratory‐controlled sediment beds were incubated with Bacillus subtilis for 5, 10, 16, and 22 days before the erosion experiments, to study the temporal and spatial variations in sediment stability caused by the bacterial secreted EPS. We found the biosedimentary systems showed different erosional behavior related to biofilm maturity and EPS distribution. In the first stage (5 days), the biosedimentary bed was more easily eroded than the clean sediment. With increasing growth period, bound EPS became more widely distributed over the vertical profile resulting in bed stabilization. After 22 days, the bound EPS was highly concentrated within a surface biofilm, but a relatively high content also extended to a depth of 5 mm and then decayed sharply with depth. The biofilm increased the critical shear stress of the bed and furthermore, it enabled the bed to withstand threshold conditions for an increased period of time as the biofilm degraded before eroding. After the loss of biofilm protection, the high EPS content in the sublayers continued to stabilize the sediment (hindered erosion) by binding individual grains, as visualized by electron microscopy. Consequently, the bed strength did not immediately revert to the abiotic condition but progressively adjusted, reflecting the depth profile of the EPS. Our experiments highlight the need to treat the EPS‐sediment conditioning as a bed‐age associated and depth‐dependent variable that should be included in the next generation of sediment transport models. Plain Language Summary: Sedimentology and geomorphology have traditionally been seen as fields in which physical and chemical processes dominate. However, microbial communities should never be bystanders, because they suffuse all sedimentary environments on earth. Under hydrodynamic forces, they take part in an impressive range of sediment processes and thus exercising a formative influence on coastal evolutions. Bio‐sediments exhibit more complex characteristics than abiotic systems, and lead to different modelling methods compared to those in traditional settings. For instance, the thresholds for sediment initiation and subsequent erosion rates are no longer solely related to particle properties (e.g., particle size, the most widely used), but mediated by glue‐like extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) secreted by microbes. From this point of view, it is easy to understand why sediments in field observations behave differently from predictions, usually appearing considerably strengthened. Our results indicate that the EPS mediation in sediment stability may vary with the rhythms of microbial growth, and re‐profile the sediment stability during different stages of cementing processes. A conceptual framework for sediment erosion is hence put forward to transform traditional sediment system to EPS‐sediment system. Key Points: Spatial and temporal changes in the concentration of EPS in the sediment are quantified over a depth profile The effect of EPS in hindering the erosion of both surface and underlying sediment is determined alongside bacterial development A conceptual erosion framework is proposed for biosedimentary system recognizing the variation from the traditional abiotic approach