Short- and long-term outcomes following pelvic exenteration for gynae-oncological and colorectal cancers: A 9 year consecutive single-centre cohort study. (July 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Short- and long-term outcomes following pelvic exenteration for gynae-oncological and colorectal cancers: A 9 year consecutive single-centre cohort study. (July 2017)
- Main Title:
- Short- and long-term outcomes following pelvic exenteration for gynae-oncological and colorectal cancers: A 9 year consecutive single-centre cohort study
- Authors:
- Katory, Mark
McLean, Ross
Paez, Edgar
Kucukmetin, Ali
Naik, Raj - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Radical pelvic exenteration can be undertaken for locally invasive or recurrent disease in both colorectal and gynaecological malignancies. In the UK this procedure is usually undertaken by the respective surgical specialties who have undergone divergent surgical training. This study describes and compares outcomes between colorectal and gynae-oncological teams following pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent gynaecological and colorectal cancers in a single-centre multi-disciplinary team. Method: A retrospective review of consecutive pelvic exenteration patients undertaken over a nine-year period in a tertiary referral centre. Analyses comparing short- and long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes were undertaken by chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Cumulative survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and factors associated with recurrence and survival determined using a Cox regression model. Results: Thirty-four exenterations were undertaken; fourteen colorectal and twenty gynae-oncological. Morbidity was seen in 50% of colorectal and 75% of gynae-oncological patients. Recurrence was seen earlier and with greater frequency in the gynaeoncology group (44.4% and median time 11 months) than the colorectal group (21.4%, median time 41 months; p > 0.05). Survival in the gynae-oncology group was also lower than the colorectal group at 1-year (69.6% vs. 92.9%) and 5-yearsAbstract: Objectives: Radical pelvic exenteration can be undertaken for locally invasive or recurrent disease in both colorectal and gynaecological malignancies. In the UK this procedure is usually undertaken by the respective surgical specialties who have undergone divergent surgical training. This study describes and compares outcomes between colorectal and gynae-oncological teams following pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent gynaecological and colorectal cancers in a single-centre multi-disciplinary team. Method: A retrospective review of consecutive pelvic exenteration patients undertaken over a nine-year period in a tertiary referral centre. Analyses comparing short- and long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes were undertaken by chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Cumulative survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and factors associated with recurrence and survival determined using a Cox regression model. Results: Thirty-four exenterations were undertaken; fourteen colorectal and twenty gynae-oncological. Morbidity was seen in 50% of colorectal and 75% of gynae-oncological patients. Recurrence was seen earlier and with greater frequency in the gynaeoncology group (44.4% and median time 11 months) than the colorectal group (21.4%, median time 41 months; p > 0.05). Survival in the gynae-oncology group was also lower than the colorectal group at 1-year (69.6% vs. 92.9%) and 5-years (58.0% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.115). The majority of gynae-oncological mortality occurred within 3-years of surgery, whilst the majority of mortality in the colorectal group was after 5-years. Conclusion: Long-term patient outcome measures, including disease recurrence and 5-year survival, for colorectal exenteration appear better than for gynaeoncology patients, however, no statistical significant difference exists between short-term outcome measures between specialties. This is likely to be caused by different baseline pathologies and disease pattern influencing longer term prognosis but may also be a function of differing surgical thresholds and patient selection bias between specialties. Peri-operative and short-term morbidity appear equivalent despite divergent surgical backgrounds and training. Highlights: There is no significant difference in post-operative short-term morbidity between colorectal and gynaecological specialties. Pelvic exenterations for gynaecological malignancy have poorer long-term outcomes including recurrence and 5 year survival. Operations for recurrent cancer result in worse disease-free survival compared with primary cancer resections. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of surgery. Volume 43(2017)
- Journal:
- International journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 43(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0043-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 38
- Page End:
- 45
- Publication Date:
- 2017-07
- Subjects:
- Pelvic exenteration -- Outcomes -- Colorectal -- Gynae-oncological
Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/17439191 ↗
http://ees.elsevier.com/ijs/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.037 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1743-9191
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.685050
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2793.xml