Sonographic Evaluation for Endometrial Polyps: The Interrupted Mucosa Sign. (14th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kamaya, Aya; Yu, Pauline Chang; Lloyd, Carla Ramas; Chen, Bertha H.; Desser, Terry S.; Maturen, Katherine E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 35:Number 11(2016)
• Page Start: 2381
• Page End: 2387
• Publication Date: 2016-09-14
• Subjects: dysfunctional uterine bleeding -- endometrial polyp -- feeding vessel -- gynecologic ultrasound -- interrupted mucosa -- pedicle artery sign; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.09007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To evaluate the interrupted mucosa sign for identification of endometrial polyps, using pathologic confirmation as the reference standard, compared to other accepted sonographic findings. Methods: We reviewed 195 patients referred for pelvic sonographic evaluations for suspected endometrial polyps in this retrospective Institutional Review Board–approved study. Of these, 82 had tissue sampling of the endometrium and constituted the final study group. Patient data, including age, menopausal status, last menstrual period, and final pathologic diagnosis, were recorded. Sonograms were reviewed by 2 blinded board‐certified radiologists for endometrial features, including thickness, echogenicity, vascularity, presence of a mass, and the interrupted mucosa sign. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 44.99 (SD, 9.88) years, 79.1% of whom were premenopausal. Pathologic diagnosis confirmed polyps in 58 (70.73%). A single feeding vessel was visualized in 36 patients with polyps (62.07%), whereas the interrupted mucosa sign was visualized in 34 (58.62%). The presence of a feeding vessel, the interrupted mucosa sign, or both detected 48 (82.76%) of the polyps. In the multivariate analysis, only the interrupted mucosa sign was a statistically significant predictor of pathologic diagnosis of a polyp ( P = .035), with an odds ratio of 3.83 (95% confidence interval, 1.10–13.29). Other sonographic findings were not independent predictors of a polyp: mass ( P = .35), single feeding vessel ( P = .31), endometrial thickness ( P = .88), and endometrial echogenicity ( P = .45). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the interrupted mucosa sign were 59%, 75%, and 85%, respectively. Conclusions: The interrupted mucosa sign is a promising sonographic sign for identification of endometrial polyps, with greater predictive power than previously described signs. It has the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of sonography, especially when used in combination with other described signs.