Assessment of template‐free modeling in CASP10 and ROLL. (17th December 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment of template‐free modeling in CASP10 and ROLL. (17th December 2013)
- Main Title:
- Assessment of template‐free modeling in CASP10 and ROLL
- Authors:
- Tai, Chin‐Hsien
Bai, Hongjun
Taylor, Todd J.
Lee, Byungkook - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: We present the assessment of predictions for Template‐Free Modeling in CASP10 and a report on the first ROLL experiment wherein predictions are collected year round for review at the regular CASP season. Models were first clustered so that duplicated or very similar ones were grouped together and represented by one model in the cluster. The representatives were then compared with targets using GDT_TS, QCS, and three additional superposition‐independent score functions newly developed for CASP10. For each target, the top 15 representatives by each score were pooled to form the Top15Union set. All models in this set were visually inspected by four of us independently using the new plugin, EvalScore, which we developed with the UCSF Chimera group. The best models were selected for each target after extensive debate among the four examiners. Groups were ranked by the number of targets (hits) for which a group's model was selected as one of the best models. The Keasar group had most hits in both categories, with four of 19 FM and eight of 36 ROLL targets. The most successful prediction servers were QUARK from Zhang's group for FM category with three hits and Zhang‐server for the ROLL category with seven hits. As observed in CASP9, many successful groups were not true "template‐free" modelers but used remote templates and/or server models to obtain their winning models. The results of the first ROLL experiment were broadly similar to those of the CASP10 FM exercise.ABSTRACT: We present the assessment of predictions for Template‐Free Modeling in CASP10 and a report on the first ROLL experiment wherein predictions are collected year round for review at the regular CASP season. Models were first clustered so that duplicated or very similar ones were grouped together and represented by one model in the cluster. The representatives were then compared with targets using GDT_TS, QCS, and three additional superposition‐independent score functions newly developed for CASP10. For each target, the top 15 representatives by each score were pooled to form the Top15Union set. All models in this set were visually inspected by four of us independently using the new plugin, EvalScore, which we developed with the UCSF Chimera group. The best models were selected for each target after extensive debate among the four examiners. Groups were ranked by the number of targets (hits) for which a group's model was selected as one of the best models. The Keasar group had most hits in both categories, with four of 19 FM and eight of 36 ROLL targets. The most successful prediction servers were QUARK from Zhang's group for FM category with three hits and Zhang‐server for the ROLL category with seven hits. As observed in CASP9, many successful groups were not true "template‐free" modelers but used remote templates and/or server models to obtain their winning models. The results of the first ROLL experiment were broadly similar to those of the CASP10 FM exercise. Proteins 2014; 82(Suppl 2):57–83. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Proteins. Volume 82(2014)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Proteins
- Issue:
- Volume 82(2014)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 82, Issue 2 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 82
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0082-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 57
- Page End:
- 83
- Publication Date:
- 2013-12-17
- Subjects:
- CASP10 -- template‐free modeling -- ROLL -- Top15Union -- EvalScore -- critical assessment -- protein structure prediction -- score function -- predictor types
Proteins -- Periodicals
Proteins -- Periodicals
572.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/prot.24470 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0887-3585
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6936.164000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2787.xml