A How‐to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. Issue 3 (9th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beier, Paul; Hansen, Lara J.; Helbrecht, Lynn; Behar, David
• Is Part Of: Conservation letters. Volume 10:Issue 3(2017:May/Jun.)
• Page Start: 288
• Page End: 296
• Publication Date: 2016-11-09
• Subjects: Actionable science -- adaptation -- climate change -- coproduction -- decision support -- resource management; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Monitoring -- Periodicals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1111/conl.12300
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-263X

Abstract

Abstract: Resource managers often need scientific information to match their decisions (typically short‐term and local) to complex, long‐term, large‐scale challenges such as adaptation to climate change. In such situations, the most reliable route to actionable science is coproduction, whereby managers, policy makers, scientists, and other stakeholders first identify specific decisions to be informed by science, and then jointly define the scope and context of the problem, research questions, methods, and outputs, make scientific inferences, and develop strategies for the appropriate use of science. Here, we present seven recommended practices intended to help scientists, managers, funders and other stakeholders carry out a coproduction project, one recommended practice to ensure that partners learn from attempts at coproduction, and two practices to promote coproduction at a programmatic level. The recommended practices focus research on decisions that need to be made, give priority to processes and outcomes over stand‐alone products, and allocate resources to organizations and individuals that engage in coproduction. Although this article focuses on the coproduction of actionable science for climate change adaptation and natural resource management, the approach is relevant to other complex natural‐human systems.