Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy. (October 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vercruyssen, Marjolein; Hultin, Margareta; Van Assche, Nele; Svensson, Krister; Naert, Ignace; Quirynen, Marc
• Is Part Of: Periodontology 2000. Volume 66(2014)
• Page Start: 228
• Page End: 246
• Publication Date: 2014-10
• Subjects: Periodontics -- Periodicals; 617.632
• DOI: 10.1111/prd.12046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-6713

Abstract

Abstract: Different computer‐assisted implant‐placement procedures are currently available. These differ in software, template manufacture, guiding device, stabilization and fixation. The literature seems to indicate that one has to accept a certain inaccuracy of ±2.0 mm, which seems large initially but is clearly smaller than for nonguided surgery. A reduction of accuracy to below 0.5 mm seems extremely difficult. A common shortcoming identified in the studies included in this review is inconsistency in how clinical data and outcome variables are reported. Another limitation is the small number of comparative clinical studies. In order to find the best guiding system or the most important parameters for optimal accuracy, more randomized clinical trials are necessary. Information on cost‐effectiveness and patient‐centered evaluations (i.e. questionnaires and interviews) must also be included.