The Eastern European experience on occupational skin diseases. Make underreporting an issue?. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moldovan, H.R.; Voidazan, S.T.; John, S.M.; Weinert, P.; Moldovan, G.; Vlasiu, M.A.; Szasz, Z.A.; Tiplica, G.S.; Szasz, S.; Marin, A.C.; Salavastru, C.M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. Volume 31(2017)Supplement 4
• Page Start: 5
• Page End: 11
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: Dermatology -- Periodicals; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; 616.5
• DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14315
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0926-9959

Abstract

Abstract: Background: While legislation in most of the Eastern European countries is nowadays widely harmonized with the legal safety and health provisions of Western countries, there is still a sustained resistance to the notification of occupational skin diseases (OSD). Objective: The aim of the study was to identify the main barriers in notification and recognition of OSD in 22 Eastern European countries. Methods: An online survey was administered to key persons in the field of occupational safety and health in 22 Eastern European countries. Multiple variables of the notification system were studied, including clinical, organizational and educational issues. Results: The main causes of underreporting OSD are ineffective enforcement of occupational safety and health legislation, contractual relationship employer–employee, long duration of the notifying process, restrictions of the notification systems in terms of who is entitled to notify an OSD, ineffective regulations in regards to the pre‐employment and periodical medical examination, ineffective compensation schemes, restraints and hesitations, mainly from the doctors, inappropriate mentalities – fear of losing the jobs, fining of the employers by the authorities, stigmatization of the workers with OSD, additional costs for employers, stakeholders' lack of interest in notifying, lack of guidelines and protocols and lack of preventive programmes. Conclusions: The most valuable method for a proper recognition of OSD is to increase the awareness of physicians involved in the management of OSD (occupational physicians, GPs, dermatologists), as well as employers and workers. There is an urgent need to improve national legislation, to develop and promote adequate preventive programmes, emphasizing ethical, legal, economical and psychological aspects in order to achieve an increased recognition and a real reporting of OSD, and to enforce an international action plan for Eastern Europe in order to improve the notification of OSD.