Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) plant. (1st May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rillo, E.; Gandiglio, M.; Lanzini, A.; Bobba, S.; Santarelli, M.; Blengini, G.
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 126(2017)
• Page Start: 585
• Page End: 602
• Publication Date: 2017-05-01
• Subjects: Life cycle analysis -- Solid Oxide Fuel Cell -- Waste water treatment plant -- Biogas; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.041
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) integrated with a CO2 recovery system is presented in this work. The goal of the work is to evaluate the environmental performance of an SOFC fueled with sewage biogas and to compare it with traditional technologies (internal combustion engines and microturbines) using the same fuel. CO2 recovery is performed through a tubular photobioreactor, fixing the recovered carbon in the form of a micro-algae. The analysis takes into account both the biogas production line (anaerobic digester) and its exploitation into the fuel cell (i.e., the power generator). Results show that the SOFC manufacturing activity is highly intensive since it requires a large amount of use of electricity. During operation, instead, the highest burden is associated with the fuel production. We analyzed two scenarios for biogas operation underlining the benefits of introducing sludge pre-thickening before the anaerobic digestion process. The use of a sludge pre-thickening system can reduce the inlet flow of natural gas into the plant, thus affecting the fuel chain contribution and reducing the overall impact. The photobioreactor results in consuming more energy than what it produces (looking at the operation phase only; the manufacturing phase was not even included) and being responsible for more carbon emissions than the amount fixed in algae. On the other side, data for the photobioreactor system were based on a real system at the proof-of-concept level. Therefore significant improvements are expected for an industrial-size system. Finally, the SOFC environmental burdens have been compared with main competitors in the same field (internal combustion engines and microturbines), showing the superior environmental performance. The proposed energy system is thus an interesting choice for cleaner energy production. Highlights: Stack manufacturing is affected by steel employment and electricity consumption. SOFC covers a high share of impacts for BoP manufacturing and system assembly. Electricity generation results are presented both for NG and biogas feedings. For electricity generation the fuel chain of NG plays a decisive role. Biogas scenarios show better performance in CC and FD categories respect to NG.