Perceived Ethics Dilemmas Among Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations. Issue 1 (January 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Perceived Ethics Dilemmas Among Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations. Issue 1 (January 2017)
- Main Title:
- Perceived Ethics Dilemmas Among Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations
- Authors:
- Westling, Craig R.
Walsh, Thom
Nelson, William A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY : This study of Pioneer accountable care organizations (ACOs) suggests that the ACO model is creating moral distress for physicians and business leaders in seven critical ways: Incompatible reimbursement models: The combination of fee‐for‐service and risk‐based contracts creates conflicting incentives. Two standards of clinical care: Patients who are enrolled in an ACO have access to more effective care management programs than patients who are not enrolled. Financial incentives versus patient choice: Providers are incentivized to refer patients within the ACO network, regardless of patient preferences. "Best" care disagreements: Incentives to provide only necessary care result in disagreements between physicians about the right care, and the perception of rationing resources. Required ACO metrics versus evidence‐based care: Some required metrics do not reflect current evidence‐based practices. Shifting resources to focus on prevention: Creating the capacity to provide teambased comprehensive primary care could result in better patient outcomes at lower cost; however, clinician burnout is a risk. Limited support systems for resolving ethical conflicts: Fragmented approaches to resolving ethical conflicts result in mismatches between organizational values and clinical and business practices. Despite an overall sense of optimism associated with the ACO model, our research identified an underlying sense of moral distress at most sites. A clearAbstract : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY : This study of Pioneer accountable care organizations (ACOs) suggests that the ACO model is creating moral distress for physicians and business leaders in seven critical ways: Incompatible reimbursement models: The combination of fee‐for‐service and risk‐based contracts creates conflicting incentives. Two standards of clinical care: Patients who are enrolled in an ACO have access to more effective care management programs than patients who are not enrolled. Financial incentives versus patient choice: Providers are incentivized to refer patients within the ACO network, regardless of patient preferences. "Best" care disagreements: Incentives to provide only necessary care result in disagreements between physicians about the right care, and the perception of rationing resources. Required ACO metrics versus evidence‐based care: Some required metrics do not reflect current evidence‐based practices. Shifting resources to focus on prevention: Creating the capacity to provide teambased comprehensive primary care could result in better patient outcomes at lower cost; however, clinician burnout is a risk. Limited support systems for resolving ethical conflicts: Fragmented approaches to resolving ethical conflicts result in mismatches between organizational values and clinical and business practices. Despite an overall sense of optimism associated with the ACO model, our research identified an underlying sense of moral distress at most sites. A clear opportunity exists for ACOs to use a more comprehensive, coordinated approach to proactively resolving ethical dilemmas while continuing the march toward risk‐based contracts. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of healthcare management. Volume 62:Issue 1(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of healthcare management
- Issue:
- Volume 62:Issue 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 62, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0062-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-01
- Subjects:
- Hospitals -- Administration -- Periodicals
Health services administration -- Periodicals
Hospital Administration
Hospitals
Delivery of Health Care
Hospital Services Administration
Health services administration
Hospitals -- Administration
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Periodicals
362.1068 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jhmonline/Pages/issuelist.aspx ↗
http://www.searchbank.com/searchbank/lcml ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?RQT=407&TS=992892704 ↗
http://www.ache.org/pubs/jhmsub.cfm ↗ - Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1096-9012
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4996.870900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2810.xml