Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation. Issue 8 (August 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation. Issue 8 (August 2017)
- Main Title:
- Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation
- Authors:
- Foley, K.G.
Christian, A.
Fielding, P.
Lewis, W.G.
Roberts, S.A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of contemporary N-staging and provide radiological–pathological correlation in patients with lymph node metastases (LNMs) that were radiologically staged N0. Materials and methods: One hundred and twelve patients were included who underwent surgery alone ( n =41) or neoadjuvant therapy ( n =71) between October 2010 and December 2015. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and combined positron-emission tomography (PET) and CT N-stage were compared to pathological N-stage [node-negative (N0) versus node-positive (N+) groups]. Fifty LNMs from 15 patients preoperatively staged as N0 were measured and the maximum size recorded. Results: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of N0 versus N+ disease with CECT, EUS, and PET/CT was 54.5%, 39.7% and 77.3%, 55.4%, 42.6% and 75%, and 57.1% 35.3%, and 90.9%, respectively. All techniques were more likely to under-stage nodal disease; CECT (X 2 32.890, df=1, p <0.001), EUS (X 2 28.471, df=1, p <0.001), and PET/CT (X 2 50.790, df=1, p <0.001). PET/CT was more likely to under-stage nodal disease than EUS ( p =0.031). Median LNM size was 3 mm, with 41 (82%) of LNMs measuring <6 mm and 22 (44%) classified as micro-metastases (≤2 mm). Conclusion: This study has demonstrated poor N-staging accuracy in the modern era of radiological staging. Eighty-two percent of LNMs measured <6 mm, making direct identification extremely challenging on medical imaging. Future researchAbstract : Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of contemporary N-staging and provide radiological–pathological correlation in patients with lymph node metastases (LNMs) that were radiologically staged N0. Materials and methods: One hundred and twelve patients were included who underwent surgery alone ( n =41) or neoadjuvant therapy ( n =71) between October 2010 and December 2015. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and combined positron-emission tomography (PET) and CT N-stage were compared to pathological N-stage [node-negative (N0) versus node-positive (N+) groups]. Fifty LNMs from 15 patients preoperatively staged as N0 were measured and the maximum size recorded. Results: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of N0 versus N+ disease with CECT, EUS, and PET/CT was 54.5%, 39.7% and 77.3%, 55.4%, 42.6% and 75%, and 57.1% 35.3%, and 90.9%, respectively. All techniques were more likely to under-stage nodal disease; CECT (X 2 32.890, df=1, p <0.001), EUS (X 2 28.471, df=1, p <0.001), and PET/CT (X 2 50.790, df=1, p <0.001). PET/CT was more likely to under-stage nodal disease than EUS ( p =0.031). Median LNM size was 3 mm, with 41 (82%) of LNMs measuring <6 mm and 22 (44%) classified as micro-metastases (≤2 mm). Conclusion: This study has demonstrated poor N-staging accuracy in the modern era of radiological staging. Eighty-two percent of LNMs measured <6 mm, making direct identification extremely challenging on medical imaging. Future research should focus on investigating and developing alternative surrogate markers to predict the likelihood of LNMs. Highlights: CECT, EUS and PET/CT N-staging accuracy is poor in oesophageal cancer. CECT, EUS and PET/CT are all more likely to under-stage nodal disease. Many lymph node metastases are too small to be identified with direct imaging. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical radiology. Volume 72:Issue 8(2017)
- Journal:
- Clinical radiology
- Issue:
- Volume 72:Issue 8(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 72, Issue 8 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 72
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0072-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 693.e1
- Page End:
- 693.e7
- Publication Date:
- 2017-08
- Subjects:
- Medical radiology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiology -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
Medical radiology
Radiotherapy
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099260 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.022 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9260
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.350000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 989.xml