Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Cephalenchus (Tylenchomorpha, Nematoda). (21st December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pereira, Tiago J.; Qing, Xue; Chang, Kuei‐Fu; Mundo‐Ocampo, Manuel; Cares, Juvenil E.; Ragsdale, Erik J.; Nguyen, Chau N.; Baldwin, James G.
• Is Part Of: Zoologica scripta. Volume 46:Number 4(2017)
• Page Start: 506
• Page End: 520
• Publication Date: 2016-12-21
• Subjects: Zoology -- Periodicals; 590.5
• DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12225
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-3256

Abstract

Abstract : The phylogenetic position of Cephalenchus is enigmatic with respect to other tylench nematodes. In this study, Cephalenchus populations representing 11 nominal species were sampled worldwide for molecular and morphological characterization. Species identification was based on light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Molecular analyses were based on the genes (i.e. 18S, 28S, 5.8S) and internal transcribed spacers (ITS‐1 and ITS‐2) of the ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Phylogenetic analyses (i.e. full and reduced alignments) of either concatenated or single genes always supported the monophyly of Cephalenchus . A sister relationship between Cephalenchus and Eutylenchus excretorius was recovered by most analyses, although branch support varies depending on the dataset used. The position of Cephalenchus + E. excretorius within Tylenchomorpha nevertheless remains ambiguous, thus highlighting the importance of sampling additional genes as well as taxa. Placement of Cephalenchus + E. excretorius as sister of Tylenchinae or Boleodorinae could not be rejected on the basis of 18S and 28S rRNA genes. Within Cephalenchus, amphidial opening morphology shows congruence with molecular‐based phylogenetic relationships, whereas the number of lines in the lateral field is likely to be a convergent trait. Morphometric analyses clearly distinguished short tail from medium–long tail species, and SEM observations seem to suggest a relation between tail length and amphidial opening. In addition, molecular phylogenies support the non‐monophyly of Cephalenchus cephalodiscus, Cephalenchus cylindricus, Cephalenchus daisuce and Cephalenchus leptus . The known extent of Cephalenchus diversity is increased with the inclusion of two new species, and the biogeography of the genus is discussed.