Mapping bald eagle activity shadows around communal roosts. Issue 5 (17th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Watts, Bryan D.; Turrin, Courtney
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 81:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 928
• Page End: 937
• Publication Date: 2017-04-17
• Subjects: bald eagle -- Chesapeake Bay -- communal roost -- Haliaeetus leucocephalus -- home range -- management buffers -- nonbreeding; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21263
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: We assessed diurnal activity patterns associated with communal roosts ( n = 26) by tracking nonbreeding bald eagles ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus ; n = 58) within the upper Chesapeake Bay, USA, 2008–2013. We used daytime locations ( n = 54, 165) to map activity shadows (using home range analytics, 90% kernel) around communal roosts, to evaluate the spatial structure and to delineate diurnal activity centers. We overlaid a range (100–3, 200 m) of buffers around the perimeter of each roost to estimate the benefits of management scenarios in extending protection to daytime activities. Activity shadows around roosts varied from 1.5 km 2 to 116 km 2 ( x ¯ = 30.3 ± 5.48 [SE]), reflecting landscape context. Roosts with small (<10 km 2 ) activity shadows tended to have simple shapes with roosts centrally located and positioned along primary shorelines. Roosts supporting large (>50 km 2 ) activity shadows tended to have complex shapes with roosts not centrally located and set back from primary shorelines. Daytime locations were highly concentrated in areas near communal roosts (76% of locations within 2 km of roost perimeters). Diurnal activity centers ( n = 38) included areas surrounding roosts and secondary activity centers that were primarily located along prominent shorelines. Communal roosts play a more significant and multi‐faceted role in the eagle life cycle than we previously understood. Many of the roosts positioned along the shoreline provided resting places during the night and day, served as social gathering places during the day, and functioned as feeding locations. Evaluation of management buffers supports current management guidelines that recommend the establishment of 800‐m buffers. Establishment of 800‐m buffers within the study area would enclose 54% of all daytime locations, 66.7% of the area enclosed within activity centers associated with roosts, and 12.1% of the area enclosed in secondary activity centers. © 2017 The Wildlife Society. Abstract : We used satellite tracking data to evaluate the spatial relationship between communal roosts and daytime activity centers in nonbreeding bald eagles within the Chesapeake Bay. Our results suggest that the current recommendation of an 800‐m disturbance buffer around communal roosts is adequate to protect roosting birds and a substantive portion of diurnal activity, and represents an equitable tradeoff between eagle protection and cost to society.