Accuracy of cytology in sub typing non small cell lung carcinomas. Issue 7 (21st April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Patel, Trupti S.; Shah, Majal G.; Gandhi, Jahnavi S.; Patel, Pratik
• Is Part Of: Diagnostic cytopathology. Volume 45:Issue 7(2017)
• Page Start: 598
• Page End: 603
• Publication Date: 2017-04-21
• Subjects: cytology -- lung -- NSCLC -- small biopsy -- sub type; Cytodiagnosis -- Periodicals; Pathology, Cellular -- Periodicals; Cytology -- Periodicals; 616.07582
• DOI: 10.1002/dc.23730
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8755-1039

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Sub typing of non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has an important task in the era of molecular and targeted therapies. Differentiating between squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) is challenging when limited material is available in lung carcinoma. We investigated the accuracy and feasibility of sub typing NSCLCs in cytology and small biopsy material. Methods: Concurrent cytology and biopsy material obtained in a single CT‐ guided procedure in lung carcinoma over a year period retrospectively. Both materials were individually sub typed and analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed. Accuracy was determined by comparing the results with IHC. Results: Total 107 of 126 cases of NSCLCs were included for analysis, where both cytology and biopsy material were adequate for interpretation. FNAC allowed tumor typing in 83 (77.6%) cases; 36 (33.6%) were ADC, 47 (43.9%) cases were SQCC and 24 (22.4%) cases diagnosed as Non‐small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified (NSCLC‐NOS). In biopsy, 86 cases (80.4%) were typed, among which 34 (31.8%) were ADC, 52 (48.6%) were SQCC and 21 (19.6%) were of NSCLC‐NOS type. The result of Chi‐square index was significant. With the aid of IHC, NSCLC‐NOS reduced from 14 (13%) cases to 2 (1.9%) cases. Conclusion: Cytology and small biopsy specimens achieved comparable specificity and accuracy in sub‐typing NSCLC and optimal results were obtain when findings from both modalities combine. The advantage of paired specimens is to maximize overall diagnostic yield and the remaining material will be available for ancillary technique like IHC or for molecular testing. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:598–603. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.