Assessing nanomaterial exposures in aquatic ecotoxicological testing: Framework and case studies based on dispersion and dissolution. Issue 4 (21st April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kennedy, Alan J.; Coleman, Jessica G.; Diamond, Stephen A.; Melby, Nicolas L.; Bednar, Anthony J.; Harmon, Ashley; Collier, Zachary A.; Moser, Robert
• Is Part Of: Nanotoxicology. Volume 11:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 546
• Page End: 557
• Publication Date: 2017-04-21
• Subjects: Nanomaterials -- aquatic toxicology -- framework -- dose response -- exposure assessment; Toxicology -- Periodicals; 615.9
• DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1317863
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-5390

Abstract

Abstract: The unique behavior of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in aqueous media and dynamic changes in particle settling, agglomeration and dissolution rates is a challenge to the consistency, reliability and interpretation of standard aquatic hazard bioassay results. While the toxicological endpoints (e.g., survival, growth, reproduction, etc.) in ecotoxicity bioassays are largely applicable to ENMs, the standard methods as written for dissolved substances are confounded by the dynamic settling, agglomeration and dissolution of particulate ENMs during the bioassay. A testing framework was designed to serve as a starting point to identify approaches for the consistent conduct of aquatic hazard tests that account for the behavior of ENMs in test media and suitable data collection to support representative exposure metrology. The framework was demonstrated by conducting three case studies testing ENMs with functionally distinct characteristics and behaviors. Pretests with a temporal sampling of particle concentration, agglomeration and dissolution were conducted on each ENM in test media. Results indicated that a silver nanoparticle (AgNP) powder was not dispersible, a nano-TiO2 powder was dispersible but unstable, and a polyvinylpyrrolidinone-coated AgNP was relatively stable in test media. Based on these functional results, Ceriodaphnia dubia bioassays were conducted to compare different exposure summary methods (nominal, arithmetic average, geometric average, time-weighted average) for calculating and expressing toxicity endpoints. Results indicated that while arithmetic means were effective for expressing the toxicity of more stable materials, time-weighted averaged concentrations were appropriate for the unstable nano-TiO2 .