Radiation dose reduction during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt implantation using a new imaging technology. Issue 86 (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Spink, C.; Avanesov, M.; Schmidt, T.; Grass, M.; Schoen, G.; Adam, G.; Bannas, P.; Koops, A.
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 86(2017)
• Page Start: 284
• Page End: 288
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) -- Radiation dosage -- Image-processing technology -- Interventional radiology -- Liver; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: The new imaging technology halved the radiation exposure. DSA image quality observed was not decreased after technology upgrade. Radiation time and contrast consumption not significantly increased using the new technology. Abstract: Objective: To compare patient radiation dose in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation before and after an imaging-processing technology upgrade. Methods: In our retrospective single-center-study, cumulative air kerma (AK), cumulative dose area product (DAP), total fluoroscopy time and contrast agent were collected from an age- and BMI-matched collective of 108 patients undergoing TIPS implantation. 54 procedures were performed before and 54 after the technology upgrade. Mean values were calculated and compared using two-tailed t -tests. Two blinded, independent readers assessed DSA image quality using a four-rank likert scale and the Wilcoxcon test. Results: The new technology demonstrated a significant reduction of 57% of mean DAP (402.8 vs. 173.3 Gycm 2, p < 0.001) and a significant reduction of 58% of mean AK (1.7 vs. 0.7 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to the precursor technology. Time of fluoroscopy (26.4 vs. 27.8 min, p = 0.45) and amount of contrast agent (109.4 vs. 114.9 ml, p = 0.62) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The DSA image quality of the new technology was not inferior (2.66 vs. 2.77, p = 0.56). Conclusions: In our study the new imaging technology halved radiation dose in patients undergoing TIPS maintaining sufficient image quality without a significant increase in radiation time or contrast consumption.