Role of Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography for Characterization and Monitoring of Extramedullary Myeloma: Comparison With Serologic Data. (1st October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pintoffl, Jan P.; Weisel, Katja; Schulze, Maximilian; Maksimovic, Olga; Claussen, Claus D.; Kramer, Ulrich; Horger, Marius
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 32:Number 10(2013)
• Page Start: 1777
• Page End: 1788
• Publication Date: 2013-10-01
• Subjects: bortezomib -- contrast enhanced sonography -- extramedullary myeloma -- lenalidomide -- tumor perfusion; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.7863/ultra.32.10.1777
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To measure blood perfusion in extramedullary myeloma by contrast‐enhanced sonography, correlate it with specific hematologic parameters, and determine their utility for local and systemic response monitoring. Methods: Twenty‐five consecutive patients (14 male and 11 female; median age, 68 years) with extramedullary myeloma were included. After intravenous administration of 2.4 mL of sulfur hexafluoride, extramedullary myeloma masses were examined for 60 seconds. All patients underwent contrast‐enhanced sonography at baseline, and 15 were monitored additionally (3 weeks during therapy). Average peak perfusion, regional blood flow (RBF), and regional blood volume (RBV) were calculated. Baseline perfusion parameters were compared with short‐term follow‐up sonographic data and serologic biomarkers (M gradient). For validation of extramedullary myeloma and systemic myeloma, patients underwent midterm (<3 months) imaging and serologic diagnosis. Results: Patients with baseline β2 ‐microglobulin (B2M) greater than 3.5 mg/L (n = 17) showed higher perfusion parameters compared with baseline B2M less than 3.5 mg/L (n = 8). At short‐term follow‐up, patients were classified by serologic criteria as responders (n = 9) and nonresponders (n = 6) and by sonographic criteria as responders (n = 10) and nonresponders (n = 5). In sonographic responders, mean peak, RBV, and RBF dropped from 59.13, 1446.09, and 71.52 (artificial units) at baseline to 29.30, 364.19, and 34.64 at follow‐up ( P < .05), whereas in nonresponders, perfusion parameters increased from 33.18, 789.82, and 36.92 at baseline to 51.14, 1491.06, and 65.34 at follow‐up ( P > .05). Prediction of a midterm course of systemic myeloma using serologic data yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.66, 0.77, 0.66, and 0.77, whereas sonographic results (judged by RBV) yielded values of 0.66, 0.55, 0.5, and 0.71. Separate prediction of a local (extramedullary myeloma) response by sonography yielded sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.8, 1.0, 1.0, and 0.71. Conclusions: Contrast‐enhanced sonography is a valuable tool for short‐term monitoring of the treatment response in extramedullary myeloma.