Evaluation of codified elastic design spectrum models for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity. Issue 70 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of codified elastic design spectrum models for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity. Issue 70 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of codified elastic design spectrum models for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity
- Authors:
- Tsang, Hing-Ho
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Design spectrum (DS) model is typically specified in a seismic code of practice for structural design. In a region of low-to-moderate seismicity where seismic code does not exist, a DS model in a well established code of practice is usually adopted, while the suitability of such model has seldom been evaluated. In this article, the elastic DS models for reference (rock) site stipulated in six major codes of practice (AS1170.4–2007, EN1998-1:2004, GB50011–2010, IBC–2012, NBCC–2010 and NZS1170.5:2004) have been compared and scrutinized. Three cities of low-to-moderate seismicity, namely, Melbourne (Australia), Hong Kong (China) and Karlsruhe (Germany), have been selected for illustrative purposes. Particular emphasis has been put on the parameterization scheme for DS model. It is found that huge discrepancies (over 100%) exist among the models, especially at the long period range, due to differences in spectral shapes and the recommended corner periods, which would lead to undesirable effects on the use of the displacement-based seismic design approach. It is urged that the values of corner periods should be determined specifically and cautiously based on the regional seismicity pattern and local geological conditions. Highlights: The first study that scrutinizes the feature of design spectrum models in six codes. The discrepancies among the models have been highlighted, quantified and explained. Insights and recommendations have been provided for developing new DSAbstract: Design spectrum (DS) model is typically specified in a seismic code of practice for structural design. In a region of low-to-moderate seismicity where seismic code does not exist, a DS model in a well established code of practice is usually adopted, while the suitability of such model has seldom been evaluated. In this article, the elastic DS models for reference (rock) site stipulated in six major codes of practice (AS1170.4–2007, EN1998-1:2004, GB50011–2010, IBC–2012, NBCC–2010 and NZS1170.5:2004) have been compared and scrutinized. Three cities of low-to-moderate seismicity, namely, Melbourne (Australia), Hong Kong (China) and Karlsruhe (Germany), have been selected for illustrative purposes. Particular emphasis has been put on the parameterization scheme for DS model. It is found that huge discrepancies (over 100%) exist among the models, especially at the long period range, due to differences in spectral shapes and the recommended corner periods, which would lead to undesirable effects on the use of the displacement-based seismic design approach. It is urged that the values of corner periods should be determined specifically and cautiously based on the regional seismicity pattern and local geological conditions. Highlights: The first study that scrutinizes the feature of design spectrum models in six codes. The discrepancies among the models have been highlighted, quantified and explained. Insights and recommendations have been provided for developing new DS model. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. Issue 70(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering
- Issue:
- Issue 70(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 70, Issue 70 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 70
- Issue:
- 70
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0070-0070-0000
- Page Start:
- 148
- Page End:
- 152
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Design spectrum -- Code of practice -- Scaling parameter -- Corner period -- Spectral shape
Soil dynamics -- Periodicals
Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals
Sols -- Dynamique -- Périodiques
Génie parasismique -- Périodiques
624.176205 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02677261 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02617277 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.016 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0267-7261
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8322.225000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1789.xml