Comparison of atmospheric particle concentration measurements using different optical detectors: Potentiality and limits for air quality applications. (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dinoi, A.; Donateo, A.; Belosi, F.; Conte, M.; Contini, D.
• Is Part Of: Measurement. Volume 106(2017)
• Page Start: 274
• Page End: 282
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: Optical particle counter -- Photometer -- β-ray attenuation -- Aerosol size distributions -- PM1; Weights and measures -- Periodicals; Measurement -- Periodicals; Measurement; Weights and measures; Periodicals; 530.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0263-2241

Abstract

Highlights: An inter-comparison of performances of optical aerosol detectors was done. Differences in counting of coarse particles independent on humidity was observed. Fine particle counting was influenced by humidity even using conditioned inlets. Performances for mass concentrations were lower than those for number concentrations. Cautions is needed using optical detectors fir air quality in high humidity conditions. Abstract: Optical detectors for atmospheric aerosol concentration measurements are often used in air quality applications given their potentialities for online measurements of air quality parameters at high temporal resolution. In this work the performances of different optical aerosol detectors used in air quality applications have been tested and compared for urban background aerosol conditions. Simultaneous measurements of aerosol number concentrations, size distributions and mass concentrations were taken in two different periods: November 2013 – February 2014 and May–June 2014 at an urban background site in Lecce (Southeastern Italy). Measurements were carried out using an OPC Grimm (mod. 1.109), an OPC FAI (Multichannel Monitor) and an optical photometer Mie pDR-1200. Good correlation, with determination coefficients R 2 larger than 0.93 were found between particle number concentrations measured by the two OPCs both in accumulation (0.28–0.90 μm for FAI and 0.29–0.90 μm for Grimm) and coarse modes (1.10–10 μm for FAI and 1.15–11.25 μm for Grimm). Absolute counting for the accumulation fraction shows that Grimm OPC detects more particles (about 10%) than FAI OPC at concentration higher than 200, 000 particles/L in condition of high RH. This could be due to the changes of the optical properties of particles in high RH conditions visible even if the inlets of the two instruments are conditioned for lowering RH in sampled air. The differences in the absolute counting of the coarse fraction does not seems to be related to RH effects. The performances in evaluating mass concentrations PM10, and PM2.5 were evaluated comparing OPCs and pDR-1200 outputs with reference gravimetric and β-ray methods (that appeared to be essentially equivalent). Good agreement between Grimm OPC and SWAM is found both in PM10 and PM2.5 fractions while FAI OPC revealed greater discrepancy and scatter with respect to reference measurements. The performances of the pDR-1200 photometer were lower with respect to the OPCs with a larger influence of RH and optical properties of particles. The analysis of diurnal average trends in number and mass concentrations as well as the high temporal resolution responses of the instruments showed that optical detectors could be very useful to investigate atmospheric aerosol for air quality applications and to individuate and investigate specific pollution events. However, especially if they are used for evaluating mass concentrations (PM1, PM2.5 or PM10), it is necessary to take into account RH effects (even if the inlet are conditioned) and, possibly, use optical detectors together with reference gravimetric or β-ray methods to check their response in the effective operative conditions.