The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. (July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. (July 2015)
- Main Title:
- The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy
- Authors:
- Redman, Sally
Turner, Tari
Davies, Huw
Williamson, Anna
Haynes, Abby
Brennan, Sue
Milat, Andrew
O'Connor, Denise
Blyth, Fiona
Jorm, Louisa
Green, Sally - Abstract:
- Abstract: The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: have a clearly articulated purpose; be informed by existing knowledge; provide an organising structure to build new knowledge; and be capable of guiding the development and testing of interventions. This paper describes the development of the SPIRIT Action Framework. A literature search and interviews with policy makers identified modifiable factors likely to influence the use of research in policy. An iterative process was used to combine these factors into a pragmatic tool which meets the four criteria. The SPIRIT Action Framework can guide conceptually-informed practical decisions in the selection and testing of interventions to increase the use of research in policy. The SPIRIT Action Framework hypothesises that a catalyst is required for the use of research, the response to which is determined by the capacity of the organisation to engage with research. Where there is sufficient capacity, a series of research engagement actions might occur that facilitate research use . These hypotheses are being tested in ongoingAbstract: The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: have a clearly articulated purpose; be informed by existing knowledge; provide an organising structure to build new knowledge; and be capable of guiding the development and testing of interventions. This paper describes the development of the SPIRIT Action Framework. A literature search and interviews with policy makers identified modifiable factors likely to influence the use of research in policy. An iterative process was used to combine these factors into a pragmatic tool which meets the four criteria. The SPIRIT Action Framework can guide conceptually-informed practical decisions in the selection and testing of interventions to increase the use of research in policy. The SPIRIT Action Framework hypothesises that a catalyst is required for the use of research, the response to which is determined by the capacity of the organisation to engage with research. Where there is sufficient capacity, a series of research engagement actions might occur that facilitate research use . These hypotheses are being tested in ongoing empirical work. Highlights: There is a lack of action-oriented approaches to guide use of research in policy. Our framework provides a pragmatic basis to develop and test interventions. It can identify the intervention strategies that are most likely to be effective. It has the potential to guide knowledge development and practical decisions. The framework draws on and extends recent theories on knowledge exchange. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Social science & medicine. Volume 136/137(2015)
- Journal:
- Social science & medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 136/137(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 136/137, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 136/137
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-NaN-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 147
- Page End:
- 155
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07
- Subjects:
- Action framework -- Knowledge exchange -- Research use
Social medicine -- Periodicals
Medical anthropology -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
Psychology -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine sociale -- Périodiques
Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques
Santé publique -- Périodiques
Psychologie -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
362.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02779536 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.009 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-9536
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8318.157000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 250.xml