Self-reported health and socio-economic inequalities in England, 1996–2009: Repeated national cross-sectional study. (July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy; Kupek, Emil; Petrou, Stavros
• Is Part Of: Social science & medicine. Volume 136/137(2015)
• Page Start: 135
• Page End: 146
• Publication Date: 2015-07
• Subjects: England -- EQ-5D utility scores -- GHQ -- Self-assessed health -- Social class -- Social inequities; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine sociale -- Périodiques; Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques; Santé publique -- Périodiques; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.026
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-9536

Abstract

Abstract: Tackling social inequalities in health has been a priority for recent UK governments. We used repeated national cross-sectional data for 155, 311 participants (aged ≥16 years) in the Health Survey of England to examine trends in socio-economic inequalities in self-reported health over a recent period of sustained policy focus by successive UK governments aimed at tackling social inequalities in health. Socio-economic related inequalities in self-reported health were estimated using the Registrar General's occupational classification (1996–2009), and for sensitivity analyses, the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC; 2001–2011). Multi-level regression was used to evaluate time trends in General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) scores and bad or very bad self-assessed health (SAH), as well as EQ-5D utility scores. The study found that the probability of reporting GHQ-12 scores ≥4 and ≥ 1 was higher in those from lower social classes, and decreased for all social classes between 1997 and 2009. For SAH, the probability of reporting bad or very bad health remained relatively constant for social class I (professional) [0.028 (95%CI: 0.026, 0.029) in 1996 compared to 0.028 (95%CI: 0.024, 0.032) in 2009], but increased in lower social classes, with the greatest increase observed amongst those in social class V (unskilled manual) [0.089 (95%CI: 0.085, 0.093) in 1996 compared to 0.155 (95%CI: 0.141, 0.168) in 2009]. EQ-5D utility scores were lower for those in lower social classes, but remained comparable across survey years. In sensitivity analyses using the NS-SEC, health outcomes improved from 2001 to 2011, with no evidence of widening socio-economic inequalities. Our findings suggest that socio-economic inequalities have persisted, with evidence of widening for some adverse self-reported health outcomes. Highlights: Study examines trends in social inequalities in health in England (1996–2009). Study uses a range of self-reported measures of health status. Study examines net changes using national data from 155, 311 participants. Findings suggest potential widening of socio-economic inequalities in health.