An Alternative Approach to Canadian House of Commons Reform. Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stilborn, Jack
• Is Part Of: American review of Canadian studies. Volume 47:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 35
• Page End: 52
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: House of Commons -- responsible government -- democratic governance -- Parliament of Canada -- parliamentary reform; Comparative civilization -- Periodicals; Canada -- Civilization -- Periodicals; Canada -- Periodicals; United States -- Periodicals; 971
• DOI: 10.1080/02722011.2017.1292534
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-2011

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Empowering backbench Members of Parliament in order to restore the effectiveness of the House of Commons has been a central theme in Canadian parliamentary reform for at least fifty years, but results are widely seen as disappointing. This article argues that unrealistic expectations, fostered by adherence to a traditional conception of the Westminster model of representative and responsible government, are part of the problem. A modernized conception of parliamentary government, recognizing the House as a forum for competing political parties between elections, could help us to better understand the House and improve its contribution to democratic governance. The proposed approach suggests innovative procedural options for legislative debate, Question Period, and other activities. It also offers a consistent basis for addressing issues such as floor-crossing, coalitions, and prorogations. More broadly, it points to the need for an integrated approach to the House, elections, political parties, public education, and citizen engagement in order to respond to contemporary democratic challenges.