An evaluation of landowners' conservation easements on their livelihoods and well-being. (May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Horton, Katharine; Knight, Heather; Galvin, Kathleen A.; Goldstein, Joshua H.; Herrington, Jennifer
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 209(2017)
• Page Start: 62
• Page End: 67
• Publication Date: 2017-05
• Subjects: US United States -- CEs conservation easements -- TNC The Nature Conservancy -- NRCS Natural Resource Conservation Service -- CPW Colorado Parks and Wildlife; Conservation -- Livelihoods -- Well-being -- Ecosystem; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Abstract: Private lands protected by conservation easements are crucial in aiding conservation efforts. While most research on measuring conservation efforts has historically been on ecological outcomes of protecting biodiversity, this study aims to measure the social outcomes of the impacts of conservation easements on private landowners' livelihoods and well-being in Colorado. We conducted 35 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with landowners who had completed conservation easements with The Nature Conservancy in Colorado. Using qualitative interview data, we analyzed what motivated landowners to complete conservation easements with TNC and how the conservation easements influenced their well-being. Five dominant themes emerged from the analyses: 1) conservation, 2) financial, 3) legal and process, 4) personal and family, and 5) social and community. Landowner motivations were to protect the ecosystem, prevent development, and financial gain through tax incentives or income. Negative neighbor reactions, time to complete or amend the easement, and tax audits were some challenges experienced. Landowners revealed that community involvement, connections, and networking were unexpected benefits and brought positive change to their life because of easements. The results from this case study can be used to inform conservation strategies that more purposefully incorporate private landowner experiences with conservation easements in planning to achieve biodiversity and conservation objectives. Coupling ecological conservation outcomes with conservation management practices and at the same time understanding the impact of conservation easements on landowners' livelihoods and well-being will further advance conservation efforts on private lands in the future. Highlights: Social science is used to understand conservation easement impact on landowners. Protecting ecosystems and financial incentives motivate landowners to conserve. Community involvement and networking an unexpected positive landowner impact. Land trust decisions enhanced by incorporating qualitative results into policy.