Exploring the evolutionary origins of overimitation: a comparison across domesticated and non‐domesticated canids. Issue 4 (22nd September 2016) - Johnston, Angie M.
Abstract: When learning from others, human children tend to faithfully copy – or 'overimitate' – the actions of a demonstrator, even when these actions are irrelevant for solving the task at hand. We investigate whether domesticated dogs ( Canis familiaris ) and dingoes ( Canis dingo ) share this tendency to overimitate in three experiments. In Experiment 1, dogs and dingoes had the opportunity to solve a puzzle after watching an ostensive demonstrator who used both a relevant action and an irrelevant action. We find clear evidence against overimitation in both species. In contrast to human children (Horner & Whiten, 2005), dogs and dingoes used the irrelevant action less often across trials, suggesting that both species were filtering out the irrelevant action as they gained experience with the puzzle (like chimpanzees; Horner & Whiten, 2005). Experiments 2 and 3 provide further evidence against overimitation, demonstrating that both species' behavior is better characterized by individual exploration than overimitation. Given that both species, particularly dogs, show human‐like social learning in other contexts, these findings provide additional evidence that overimitation may be a unique aspect of human social learning. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at:https://youtu.be/g2mRniJZ7aU . Abstract : In three studies we investigate whether dogs ( Canis familiaris ) and dingoes ( Canis dingo ) overimitate. We find clear evidence against overimitation in both species. Although human children copy irrelevant actions across trials, dogs and dingoes filter out irrelevant actions as they gain experience across trials.