Immediate Versus Standard Postpartum Screening for Diabetes [35B]. (May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Immediate Versus Standard Postpartum Screening for Diabetes [35B]. (May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Immediate Versus Standard Postpartum Screening for Diabetes [35B]
- Authors:
- Hsieh, Frances
Blitz, Matthew
Akerman, Meredith
Simmonds, Lisa
Rabin, Jill
Meirowitz, Natalie - Abstract:
- Abstract : INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend women with gestational diabetes undergo diabetes screening 6-12 weeks postpartum, however the compliance rate is only about 50%. Failure to return for care is a major barrier to postpartum screening. We sought to determine whether immediate postpartum screening is as reliable as standard postpartum screening at 6-12 weeks postpartum. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study with women with singleton gestations and gestational diabetes (A1 or A2). Patients underwent a 2-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on postpartum day 2, and were asked to repeat the OGTT at 6-12 weeks postpartum. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the immediate postpartum OGTT were calculated as compared to the gold standard, the OGTT at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Results were considered abnormal if either the fasting blood glucose (BG) value was greater than 100mg/dL or the 2-hour BG value was greater than 140mg/dL. RESULTS: 141 patients have been enrolled in the study. At this interim analysis, 70 completed the immediate postpartum screening for diabetes, and 53 returned for screening at the standard timeframe. Only the 53 patients with complete data were included in our analysis. The immediate OGTT had a sensitivity of 82.4%, specificity of 47.22%, NPV of 85.0% and PPV of 42.4%. CONCLUSION: Screening for diabetes immediately on postpartum day 2 is not a reliable substituteAbstract : INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend women with gestational diabetes undergo diabetes screening 6-12 weeks postpartum, however the compliance rate is only about 50%. Failure to return for care is a major barrier to postpartum screening. We sought to determine whether immediate postpartum screening is as reliable as standard postpartum screening at 6-12 weeks postpartum. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study with women with singleton gestations and gestational diabetes (A1 or A2). Patients underwent a 2-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on postpartum day 2, and were asked to repeat the OGTT at 6-12 weeks postpartum. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the immediate postpartum OGTT were calculated as compared to the gold standard, the OGTT at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Results were considered abnormal if either the fasting blood glucose (BG) value was greater than 100mg/dL or the 2-hour BG value was greater than 140mg/dL. RESULTS: 141 patients have been enrolled in the study. At this interim analysis, 70 completed the immediate postpartum screening for diabetes, and 53 returned for screening at the standard timeframe. Only the 53 patients with complete data were included in our analysis. The immediate OGTT had a sensitivity of 82.4%, specificity of 47.22%, NPV of 85.0% and PPV of 42.4%. CONCLUSION: Screening for diabetes immediately on postpartum day 2 is not a reliable substitute for screening at the current standard timeframe. Continued research with additional patients, and an analysis of clinical characteristics, may determine for which patients immediate screening is useful. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 129 (2017)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 129 (2017)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 129, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 129
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0129-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000514305.54514.81 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 32.xml