Preliminary Baseline Findings of the CALM (Comfort, Assurance, Language Model) Approach [37A]. (May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Preliminary Baseline Findings of the CALM (Comfort, Assurance, Language Model) Approach [37A]. (May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Preliminary Baseline Findings of the CALM (Comfort, Assurance, Language Model) Approach [37A]
- Authors:
- Ginde, Savita
Stempinski-Metoyer, Kelly
Bridge, Rebecca
Abraham, Angel
Patel, Ashlesha - Abstract:
- Abstract : INTRODUCTION: Concerns about pain during IUC insertion are common among women and limit acceptability of IUCs. This study evaluates pain associated with IUC insertion prior to CALM intervention implementation (presence of a support person dedicated to patient comfort, enhanced assurance, scripted gentle language). METHODS: Women ages 18-53 seeking IUC insertion were recruited for participation at two clinic sites. There are 110 women in the control group receiving standard of care procedures. We calculated mean VAS Pain Scores from a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire, 2 pre-insertion scales, 5 time points during the procedure and overall, and 2 post-procedure scales. We calculated t-tests for binary variables, ANOVA for categorical variables, and linear regression for continuous variables. RESULTS: Participants received 77 Mirena and 32 Paragard IUCs. VAS scores were M= 32.2mm for pain sensitivity, M= 48.0mm for pain expected, M=49.7mm for post procedure pain, M= 51.7mm for entire procedure pain, and M= 53.8mm for IUC insertion pain. There was a moderately significant difference in post procedure pain means between parous and nulliparous women (p-val = 0.05) and provider reported procedure difficulty (p-val=0.07). Pain sensitivity mean and pain level during period significantly predicted post procedure pain (p-val < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Nulliparous women had a greater mean VAS pain score than parous women, and more difficult provider experience had a greater mean VASAbstract : INTRODUCTION: Concerns about pain during IUC insertion are common among women and limit acceptability of IUCs. This study evaluates pain associated with IUC insertion prior to CALM intervention implementation (presence of a support person dedicated to patient comfort, enhanced assurance, scripted gentle language). METHODS: Women ages 18-53 seeking IUC insertion were recruited for participation at two clinic sites. There are 110 women in the control group receiving standard of care procedures. We calculated mean VAS Pain Scores from a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire, 2 pre-insertion scales, 5 time points during the procedure and overall, and 2 post-procedure scales. We calculated t-tests for binary variables, ANOVA for categorical variables, and linear regression for continuous variables. RESULTS: Participants received 77 Mirena and 32 Paragard IUCs. VAS scores were M= 32.2mm for pain sensitivity, M= 48.0mm for pain expected, M=49.7mm for post procedure pain, M= 51.7mm for entire procedure pain, and M= 53.8mm for IUC insertion pain. There was a moderately significant difference in post procedure pain means between parous and nulliparous women (p-val = 0.05) and provider reported procedure difficulty (p-val=0.07). Pain sensitivity mean and pain level during period significantly predicted post procedure pain (p-val < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Nulliparous women had a greater mean VAS pain score than parous women, and more difficult provider experience had a greater mean VAS pain score. There is a linear relationship between both period pain and pain sensitivity with post procedure pain. This may allow us to identify those most at risk for painful IUC insertion. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 129 (2017)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 129 (2017)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 129, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 129
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0129-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000514271.87687.87 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 32.xml