The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma. Issue 12 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma. Issue 12 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma
- Authors:
- Rice, David
Chansky, Kari
Nowak, Anna
Pass, Harvey
Kindler, Hedy
Shemanski, Lynn
Opitz, Isabelle
Call, Sergi
Hasegawa, Seiki
Kernstine, Kemp
Atinkaya, Cansel
Rea, Federico
Nafteux, Philippe
Rusch, Valerie W. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT : Introduction: : Nodal categories for malignant pleural mesothelioma are derived from the lung cancer staging system and have not been adequately validated. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a multinational database to generate evidence‐based recommendations to inform the eighth edition of the TNM classification of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods: : Data from 29 centers were entered prospectively (n = 1566) or by transfer of retrospective data (n = 1953). Survival according to the seventh edition N categories was evaluated using Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Survival was measured from the date of diagnosis. Results: : There were 2432 analyzable cases: 1603 had clinical (c) staging, 1614 had pathologic (p) staging, and 785 had both. For clinically staged tumors there was no separation in Kaplan‐Meier curves between cN0, cN1 or cN2 (cN1 versus cN0 hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, p = 0.77 and cN2 versus cN1 HR = 1.04, p = 0.85). For pathologically staged tumors, patients with pN1 or pN2 tumors had worse survival than those with pN0 tumors (HR = 1.51, p < 0.0001) but no survival difference was noted between those with pN1 and pN2 tumors (HR = 0.99, p = 0.99). Patients with both pN1 and pN2 nodal involvement had poorer survival than those with pN2 tumors only (HR = 1.60, p = 0.007) or pN0 tumors (HR = 1.62, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: : A recommendation to collapse both clinical and pN1ABSTRACT : Introduction: : Nodal categories for malignant pleural mesothelioma are derived from the lung cancer staging system and have not been adequately validated. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a multinational database to generate evidence‐based recommendations to inform the eighth edition of the TNM classification of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods: : Data from 29 centers were entered prospectively (n = 1566) or by transfer of retrospective data (n = 1953). Survival according to the seventh edition N categories was evaluated using Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Survival was measured from the date of diagnosis. Results: : There were 2432 analyzable cases: 1603 had clinical (c) staging, 1614 had pathologic (p) staging, and 785 had both. For clinically staged tumors there was no separation in Kaplan‐Meier curves between cN0, cN1 or cN2 (cN1 versus cN0 hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, p = 0.77 and cN2 versus cN1 HR = 1.04, p = 0.85). For pathologically staged tumors, patients with pN1 or pN2 tumors had worse survival than those with pN0 tumors (HR = 1.51, p < 0.0001) but no survival difference was noted between those with pN1 and pN2 tumors (HR = 0.99, p = 0.99). Patients with both pN1 and pN2 nodal involvement had poorer survival than those with pN2 tumors only (HR = 1.60, p = 0.007) or pN0 tumors (HR = 1.62, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: : A recommendation to collapse both clinical and pN1 and pN2 categories into a single N category comprising ipsilateral, intrathoracic nodal metastases (N1) will be made for the eighth edition staging system. Nodes previously categorized as N3 will be reclassified as N2. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of thoracic oncology. Volume 11:Issue 12(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of thoracic oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 12(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 12 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0011-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- Mesothelioma -- Cancer staging -- Nodal metastases -- Database
Chest -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Thoracic Neoplasms -- Periodicals
616.99494005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01243894-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01243894-200601000-00001 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15560864/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.09.121 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1556-0864
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5069.124000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1983.xml