Validity of near‐infrared interactance (FUTREX 6100/XL) for estimating body fat percentage in elite rowers. (15th December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fukuda, David H.; Wray, Mandy E.; Kendall, Kristina L.; Smith‐Ryan, Abbie E.; Stout, Jeffrey R.
• Is Part Of: Clinical physiology and functional imaging. Volume 37:Number 4(2017:Jul.)
• Page Start: 456
• Page End: 458
• Publication Date: 2015-12-15
• Subjects: athletes -- body composition -- hydrostatic weighing -- skinfolds -- weight restriction; Physiology, Pathological -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12328
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-0961

Abstract

Summary: This investigation aimed to compare hydrostatic weighing (HW) with near‐infrared interactance (NIR) and skinfold measurements (SKF) in estimating body fat percentage (FAT%) in rowing athletes. FAT% was estimated in 20 elite male rowers (mean ± SD: age = 24·8 ± 2·2 years, height = 191·0 ± 6·8 cm, weight = 86·8 ± 11·3 kg, HW FAT% = 11·50 ± 3·16%) using HW with residual volume, 3‐site SKF and NIR on the biceps brachii . Predicted FAT% values for NIR and SKF were validated against the criterion method of HW. Constant error was not significant for NIR (−0·06, P = 0·955) or SKF (−0·20, P = 0·813). Neither NIR ( r = 0·045) nor SKF ( r = 0·229) demonstrated significant validity coefficients when compared to HW. The standard error of the estimate values for NIR and SKF were both less than 3·5%, while total error was 4·34% and 3·60%, respectively. When compared to HW, SKF and NIR provide similar mean values when compared to HW, but the lack of apparent relationships between individual values and borderline unacceptable total error may limit their application in this population.